Since the U.S. Supreme Court is exercising its muscle to thwart justice, I see no reason why the U.S. Senate shouldn't exercise a little muscle of their own and start to hold hearings on the basis of potential "bad behavior" as provided in the Constitution.

The hearings might even bring up the subject of term limits and involuntary recusals.

If nothing else, hearings could throw some light on how the conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court are playing political games with the justice system to the detriment of America.

I don't know what the U.S. Supreme Court hopes to gain by helping Trump. Their reputation is already shot to hell. Are they hoping he'll keep them around if he gets elected? Don't they know that Dictators don't need a Supreme Court to agree with him? Don't they know that the first time they dare disagree with the Dictator they'll end up falling out a window.

The justices aren't deaf, dumb and blind. They know exactly who they're dealing with ~ or better yet, WHAT they're dealing with.

So, why is the question?

TRUTHY

I don't see a Supreme Court even existing very long if Trump is elected. Or the Constitution either. Or any General who disagrees with him or a Congress with any authority over him.

Trump, who is particularly sensitive to criticism, (or taking advice) and who believes that he's never wrong about anything, would never tolerate anybody who dared disagree with him. He has a tendency to fly into rages when that happens.

Actually, since Trump admires Putin so much, I think our new constitution will be a carbon copy of the one that keeps Mr. Putin in office. Especially around re-election time.

Fear and intimidation are right up Trump's ally. He thrives on that sense of power.

Remember the book "Too much and Never Enough. That's Trump to a tee.