More from the article...

... In her first public remarks since the nation's highest court wrapped up its term earlier this month, Kagan said she wouldn't have signed onto the new rules if she didn't believe they were good. But having good rules is not enough, she said.

"The thing that can be criticized is, you know, rules usually have enforcement mechanisms attached to them, and this one -- this set of rules -- does not,"

Kagan said at an annual judicial conference held by the 9th Circuit. More than 150 judges, attorneys, court personnel and others attended. ...

Gee, I have to wonder what the apparent grifter, e.g. Justice Thomas?, has to say about this proposal?