Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, September 03, 2024

When asked why he robbed banks, legendary fugitive Willie Sutton replied, "That's where the money is." Governments coerce social media platforms into censorship for the same simple reason: That's where the objectionable speech is. Thanks to a recent Supreme Court case, in America, there's also little to stop them.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

This is the thread where an anonymous asshat on social media squeals about being censored by linking to social media as evidence of being censored

So ---- stupid

#1 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2024-09-03 03:20 PM | Reply

Jeff just gets sadder by the day.

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2024-09-03 03:22 PM | Reply

BullBringer can't wait for republicans to turn the US into the USSR

#3 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-09-03 03:24 PM | Reply

I think I'll just give up on this Felon lapping miscreant.

---- off, clownboy.

" That's where the ------- LIES are"

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-09-03 03:31 PM | Reply

Once again stinkerbell sides with a billionaire whose "legal responsibility is to his shareholders, not to the public and its freedoms." And shows that he has no understanding of the first amendment and it's relation to social media.

"So ---- stupid"

Like Tom Hanks said, "stupid is as stupid does".

#5 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-09-03 03:31 PM | Reply

Yet another garbage article from yet another garbage site posted by yet same garbage poster.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2024-09-03 03:48 PM | Reply

You clowns are pathetic. You all love censorship and cannot abide ANY opposing viewpoints. Bunch of pansies.

#7 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-09-03 03:56 PM | Reply | Funny: 2

You clowns are pathetic. You all love censorship and cannot abide ANY opposing viewpoints. Bunch of pansies.

Posted by BellRinger at 2024-09-03 03:56 PM | Reply

Says the guy who has no problems with banning books in public libraries.

Physician heal thyself.

#8 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2024-09-03 03:59 PM | Reply

You clowns are pathetic. You all love censorship and cannot abide ANY opposing viewpoints. Bunch of pansies.

#7 | Posted by BellRinger

You must hate Musk for censoring so much on Twitter now.

Just kidding. We know you won't even acknowledge it.

#9 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-09-03 04:01 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"You all love censorship and cannot abide ANY opposing viewpoints."

Speaking for myself I can't abide such blatant ignorance of the constitution and in particular how the first amendment has been interpreted and applied in America and will speak out against attempts at propaganda and misinformation any chance I get.

#10 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-09-03 04:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

- ANY opposing viewpoints.

Yeah, see in the Trumpublican Party, criminals and traitors are just people with opposing viewpoints.

#11 | Posted by Corky at 2024-09-03 04:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

How this for an opposing view

The fact you can freely and openly voice your supposed "censorship" is proof you aren't being censored at all

Tool

#12 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2024-09-03 04:23 PM | Reply

Anybody can start a thread about the merits of building a candy house
But only a tool will demand a counter argument to what is so obviously an asinine position

#13 | Posted by ChiefTutMoses at 2024-09-03 04:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

She flat out says it and even Jake Tapper appears taken aback

x.com

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-09-03 04:56 PM | Reply

She flat out says it and even Jake Tapper appears taken aback
x.com

#14 | Posted by BellRinger

Fake Doctor on X: "I am a doctor and drinking rat poison will cure COVID."

Jeff: 1st Amendment Protections!

Random X User: "Drag Queen."

Jeff: CENSOR IT! CENSOR IT NOW!

#15 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-09-04 10:29 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

She flat out says it and even Jake Tapper appears taken aback

What do you find unacceptable about what she's saying? Tapper didn't appear taken back in the slightest.

There should be accountability for false or misleading statements made.

Why do you think there are laws prohibiting slander and libel?

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-09-04 03:05 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort