Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, April 03, 2025

Laura Loomer, a far-right conspiracy theorist and Islamophobic former Republican congressional candidate banned from Uber, Paypal and some social media platforms, has apparently been successful in pushing the White House to fire national security staffers for disloyalty.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Breaking NYT: Laura Loomer, the far-right activist and promoter of conspiracy theories, met on Wednesday with Trump in the Oval Office, where she pressed for him to fire National Security Council staff members whom she deemed disloyal to him. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/03/u ...

[image or embed]

-- Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1.bsky.social) April 3, 2025 at 11:00 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the cited article...

... Loomer has recently targeted deputy national security adviser Alex Wong on social media, questioning his loyalty because his wife worked as a justice department lawyer during Democratic administrations.

She baselessly claimed Wong deliberately added the Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, to the sensitive chat "as part of a foreign opp to embarrass the Trump administration on behalf of China". ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-04-03 01:59 PM | Reply

Laura Loomer, Loyalty Czar.

And mushroom tender.

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-04-03 03:17 PM | Reply

Loomer-- big surprise.

Pay no attention to the huge number of lying Zionists pulling the strings within America's highest levels of leadership. Remember, your real enemy are rainbow flags on front lawns in rural America, teenagers protesting on college campuses and half-starved brown toddlers playing with corncob dolls half-a-world away.

#3 | Posted by ExpectingReign at 2025-04-03 03:32 PM | Reply

During their meeting did Mango Lardo Face blow all the guys in the room, or did she just blow Dotard who made the others watch?

#4 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2025-04-03 11:38 PM | Reply

OK, taking a step back from the innate absurdity of the topic ...

Let's look at how Pres Trump seems to decide upon his staff and advisors ...

So, no DEI is allowed.

But ...

The main requirement seems to be, not merit or qualification for the position to be filled, but an obsequious loyalty to Pres Trump.


That is good ... why?


#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-04-04 02:03 AM | Reply

#5 Lamplighter,

I disagree with how you've framed it, although you are not far off the mark.

In the Constitution the executive branch powers ultimately reside in POTUS.

Unfortunately, over the past several decades congress has continued to cede its own powers via overly broad and ambiguous legislation that gives inordinate powers to the Executive to implement.

So now, POTUS has an outsized segment of the separation of powers.

This means, staffing of bureaucrats and unelected agencies dictate law, to a far too significant extent IMO.

Given the governmental power imbalance that has taken place and has crept forward since WWII it means POTUS has an imbalance of power.

Now, let's 'circle back' to Article II of the Constitution... With this imbalance in place the Executive controls almost ALL of these agencies.

Which means they are NOT independent and never have been. Right now, we have reached a point where 'lawmaking' is done far more by unelected bureaucrats than by elected officials

It needs to be drawn back. I don't know how we get there but blistering hatred of Trump might be a start - he's using ALL of the powers gifted to POTUS over the past few decades.

#6 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-04-04 02:52 AM | Reply

Just came here to verify-

theguardian.com
archive.is

and-
according to two people familiar with the matter.

An unsourced hit piece appearing in a tabloid from an unfriendly foreign country.
Imagine that.

#7 | Posted by itchyp at 2025-04-04 04:48 AM | Reply

It's been reported by other outlets as well who had their own leaky sources (Waltz) in the meeting. Dotard taking NSC staffing advice from a lunatic like Mango Lardo Face Loomer is so on-brand for this regime. I wonder if Dotard gave her syphilis when she blew him late last year.

#8 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2025-04-04 06:06 AM | Reply

Oh, and Swampcrotch, you don't expect sources (Waltz) in a meeting to go on the record do you? I mean how stupid are you? That would likely mean instant rendition to El Salvador.

#9 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2025-04-04 06:09 AM | Reply

This is the creature that has the ear of Trumpf and got several people fired: twitter.com

Mike Waltz must be furious.

#10 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-04-04 06:14 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort