Flock haters cross political divides to remove cameras
Flock Safety -- the surveillance company behind the country's largest network of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) -- currently faces attacks on multiple fronts seeking to tear down the invasive and error-prone cameras across the US.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
lamplighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2025/11/06
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Flock haters cross political divides to remove cameras (2 comments) ...
Nearly 50% of Floridians considering moving (10 comments) ...
Tax Increase on Colorado's Wealthy to Fund School Meals (5 comments) ...
New York Times Tops 12 Million Subscribers for First Time (6 comments) ...
What's really concerning Republicans after Tuesday’s romp (4 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... This week, two lawmakers, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), called for a federal investigation, alleging that Flock has been "negligently handling Americans' personal data" by failing to use cybersecurity best practices. The month prior, Wyden wrote a letter to Flock CEO Garrett Langley, alleging that Flock's security failures mean that "abuse of Flock cameras is inevitable" and that they threaten to expose billions of people's harvested data should a catastrophic breach occur. "In my view, local elected officials can best protect their constituents from the inevitable abuses of Flock cameras by removing Flock from their communities," Wyden wrote. Several communities have already come to this conclusion, although their concerns go beyond fears of hackers or potential data breaches. They're also concerned that law enforcement will use the sweeping database for invasive tracking. For instance, Texas scanned more than 80,000 ALPRs to allegedly do a wellness check on a woman suspected of self-administering an abortion, 404 Media reported. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has also worked with local police to conduct "immigration"-related searches of Flock data, 404 Media reported. (Langley wrote in a blog that providing ICE access is a local decision, "not Flock's decision.") ...
"In my view, local elected officials can best protect their constituents from the inevitable abuses of Flock cameras by removing Flock from their communities," Wyden wrote.
Several communities have already come to this conclusion, although their concerns go beyond fears of hackers or potential data breaches.
They're also concerned that law enforcement will use the sweeping database for invasive tracking. For instance, Texas scanned more than 80,000 ALPRs to allegedly do a wellness check on a woman suspected of self-administering an abortion, 404 Media reported.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has also worked with local police to conduct "immigration"-related searches of Flock data, 404 Media reported. (Langley wrote in a blog that providing ICE access is a local decision, "not Flock's decision.") ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-06 03:40 PM | Reply
I agree with this vandalism.
We are surveilled more than enough.
Stop treating people like criminals.
#2 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-11-06 03:45 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy