Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, October 09, 2026

A US judge ruled on Friday that the Justice Department's push to obtain state voter rolls and check them against a federal immigration database in order to demand that states remove voters it deemed ineligible was unlawful.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan's decision marked the latest setback for President Donald Trump's push to expand federal control over election administration ahead of the November 3 midterms, with his Republican Party battling to hold majorities in both houses of Congress.

In a 78-page decision siding with a challenge to the Justice Department's practice brought by watchdog group Common Cause, Sooknanan wrote that the Justice Department had downplayed the risk that its practice would wrongfully disenfranchise eligible US citizens despite evidence that the immigration database, known as SAVE, could be inaccurate.

"The challenged policy represents the federal government's attempt to decide who gets to vote. But Congress has left that authority where our Constitution has always placed it: with the states," wrote Sooknanan, who is based in Washington and was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. ...



#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 03:15 PM | Reply

Over 15,000.

Be specific.

185.

Name them.

Here's the list we're sure about.

All 185 are legal voters.

...Crickets

#2 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-10-09 03:40 PM | Reply

Another view ...

Federal judge rules against Trump DoJ's policy of collecting state voter rolls
www.theguardian.com

... "The Court vacates a policy that has removed United States citizens from the voter rolls in their home states and risks disenfranchising many more -- a policy that flies in the face of duly enacted laws designed to protect Americans," Sooknanan wrote.

Sooknanan said the policy not only violated federal laws, but that the justice department did not have the authority to enact it because Congress gave states the authority to maintain their voter rolls.

"Behind all the window dressing, the challenged policy represents the federal government's attempt to decide who gets to vote," Sooknanan wrote. "But Congress has left that authority where our Constitution has always placed it: with the states." ...


#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-09 03:47 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort