Advertisement
A Rising Democratic Star Is Ready for New Leadership
Mallory McMorrow doesn't claim to have all the answers for the Democratic Party. But as the 38-year-old Michigan Democrat gears up for a likely Senate run next month, she says generational change is needed--including at the leadership level.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
Gal_Tuesday
Joined 2003/07/01Visited 2025/04/01
Status: user
MORE STORIES
DOGE Is Trying to Gift Itself a $500 Million Building (10 comments) ...
A Better DOGE: Downsize Optimally/Gore's Example (1 comments) ...
The Proud Boys and Militias Come to Tesla’s Defense (6 comments) ...
GOP Plan: Deny MILLIONS of Women the Right to Vote (10 comments) ...
Musk’s Government Cuts Creating Massive New Expenses (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
FTA: "I think it is" time for Schumer to step back, McMorrow said. "There's still this idea that Democrats and Republicans are still abiding by the same rules and still believe in the same norms and systems and structure. There seems to be a lack of recognition that this is no longer the Republican Party. This is a MAGA party. And the same approach is not going to work."
And:
Q: Democrats have been struggling to find their footing since Donald Trump won in November. Is there an ideological shift that needs to take place? A: I don't know that it's ideological, more just the approach. I think that what is very clear--was clear in 2024 throughout the election cycle, and even still now--is there are a lot of people who don't know what Democrats stand for, and what Democrats can and will do for them in a way that gives them a vision of something that they want to vote for. That transcends political ideology, but it's just back to basics. How do you approach this moment? How do you respond to a Trump presidency, and the fact that Elon Musk has access to basically all of the government, and they are very comfortable rapidly tearing it down? I think it's less ideological and more: Are you willing to fight for a future, and what is that future? And can you clearly articulate that to people? Q: The operative axis, you're saying, revolves less around whether Democrats should move left or right, but around whether they should fight or accommodate? A: Right. It's fighting. Because right now, what people see is Donald Trump and Elon Musk and everybody who's in there right now are more than comfortable paring down the government piece by piece. The checks and balances no longer exist. So you either fight for a future or you don't. And that isn't about whether a party moves left or right or center. It's just, is there a future or not, and how do you fight for it?
A: I don't know that it's ideological, more just the approach. I think that what is very clear--was clear in 2024 throughout the election cycle, and even still now--is there are a lot of people who don't know what Democrats stand for, and what Democrats can and will do for them in a way that gives them a vision of something that they want to vote for. That transcends political ideology, but it's just back to basics. How do you approach this moment? How do you respond to a Trump presidency, and the fact that Elon Musk has access to basically all of the government, and they are very comfortable rapidly tearing it down?
I think it's less ideological and more: Are you willing to fight for a future, and what is that future? And can you clearly articulate that to people?
Q: The operative axis, you're saying, revolves less around whether Democrats should move left or right, but around whether they should fight or accommodate?
A: Right. It's fighting. Because right now, what people see is Donald Trump and Elon Musk and everybody who's in there right now are more than comfortable paring down the government piece by piece. The checks and balances no longer exist. So you either fight for a future or you don't. And that isn't about whether a party moves left or right or center. It's just, is there a future or not, and how do you fight for it?
#1 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-03-26 04:40 PM | Reply
Democrats in 2025:
I know the perfect leader we need to turn around the party. Let's update our image from one of old white Karens trying to shame men into supporting our liberal nonsense into one of middle-aged white Karens trying to shame men into supporting our liberal nonsense.
So, liberal nonsense stays - there is no debating that. But, now brought to you by a slightly younger version of a Karen.
Great job team!
#2 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-03-26 07:56 PM | Reply
I thought AOC was the golden child.
#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-03-26 10:20 PM | Reply
"I thought AOC was the golden child. #3 | Posted by lfthndthrds"
She is sporting mom jeans and 10lbs extra fat - she has about 3-4 years left before she needs her wedding ring to have an elastic band installed. Dems are smart to leave her behind at this point.
#4 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-03-26 10:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
She is sporting mom jeans and 10lbs extra fat
Doe 174's FUPA weighs more than AOC.
#5 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-03-26 10:32 PM | Reply
"Doe 174's FUPA weighs more than AOC. #5 | Posted by reinheitsgebot"
Sorry, I don't understand your ------ code-talk. Frankly, I probably don't want to either.
#6 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-03-27 12:26 AM | Reply
#6 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-03-27 12:26 AM | Reply | Flag:
He uses code-speak to throw off the FBI pedo-surveillance van parked out front of his apartment.
#7 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-03-27 08:24 AM | Reply | Funny: 1
NAMBLAturds soaks his pink sock in cod liver oil.
#8 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-03-27 10:01 AM | Reply
Doe 174's FUPA weighs more than AOC. #5 | Posted by reinheitsgebot Sorry, I don't understand your ------ code-talk. Frankly, I probably don't want to either. #6 | Posted by ScottS He uses code-speak to throw off the FBI pedo-surveillance van parked out front of his apartment. #7 | Posted by lfthndthrds
Trumpers really are stupid.
#9 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-03-27 10:58 AM | Reply
Trumpers really are stupid. #9 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT
Mallory writes a book "Hate won't win", and yet all her supporters have is hate.
#10 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-03-27 11:03 AM | Reply
all her supporters have is hate.
#10 | POSTED BY IAMRUNT
www.cbsnews.com
#11 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-03-27 11:11 AM | Reply
#10 | Posted by oneironaut
dems have done little more than preach hate for 8 going on 9 years..
NO PLACE more evident than right here...
take just this one example.....Jamal Bowman on CNN....
one of the dozen people watching could take that rhetoric and key a tesla OR MUCH WORSE>..and HOPEFULLY
get 20 years in prison....
.it's the same old story......leftist ALWAYS accuse the right of doing
exactly what they have done and do...
#12 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-03-27 11:31 AM | Reply
idiots.
#13 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-03-27 11:32 AM | Reply
BUT I feel some sympathy for the lying bastards....whoever thinks !!! they're taking over...
todays democrat has to be against good health / support corruption / support war
oppose free speech / promote high taxes / support gun control and open borders letting in
rapist--thieves and murderers.
#14 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-03-27 11:36 AM | Reply
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy