... A federal judge has blocked the Biden administration from deporting noncitizens ...

Huh?

... The judge said deporting people without this process could lead to serious harm, such as torture or death, and violates basic legal protections. The order applies to all noncitizens with final removal orders. ...

So, basically agreeing with the SCOTUS 9-0 ruling about due process.

@#4

Yeah.

I've been there, and have made similar mistakes.

But to the point of your comment...

Another Judge seems to have concerns with Pres Trump's actions.

From the cited article ...

... "Defendants argue that the United States may send a deportable alien to a country not of their origin, not where an immigration judge has ordered, where they may be immediately tortured and killed, without providing that person any opportunity to tell the deporting authorities that they face grave danger or death because of such a deportation," Judge Murphy wrote.

"All nine sitting justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Assistant Solicitor General of the United States, Congress, common sense, basic decency, and this Court all disagree."

The ruling throws a roadblock in the Trump administration's policy of removing noncitizens to countries like El Salvador, Honduras, or Panama, even if the noncitizens lack an order of removal to those countries. ...

At this point, I have to wonder ... how long will Pres Trump continue to allow Court Judges to interfere in his actions?

@#1 ... Judge Murphy criticized the administration's argument that it could send deportable noncitizens to countries where they might face torture or death without giving them an opportunity to voice their fears.

He cited consensus across the Supreme Court, Congress, and basic decency against such a policy ...

So, will Pres Trump prevail in his disregard of the Court rulings?

Or will he eventually back down?

Time will tell.