Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, January 10, 2026

It's at least the third ruling against the president's March executive order targeting state election processes.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... A federal judge has barred the Trump administration from threatening to withhold federal election funding for states that refuse to alter their voter registration forms or voting systems to President Donald Trump's liking.

U.S. District Judge John Chun ruled Friday that Trump's threat to pull Election Assistance Commission funds was an attempt to put unconstitutional pressure on states even though the president " by design " has no formal power to determine how states administer elections.

"The President has no authority to unilaterally impose new conditions on federal funds," Chun wrote in a 75-page ruling. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-10 01:19 PM | Reply

Related ...

Justice Department sues Connecticut and Arizona as part of effort to get voter data from the states
www.scrippsnews.com

... Officials in Connecticut and Arizona are defending their decision to refuse a request by the U.S. Justice Department for detailed voter information, after their states became the latest to face federal lawsuits over the issue.

"Pound sand," Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes posted on X, saying the release of the voter records would violate state and federal law.

The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division announced this week it was suing Connecticut and Arizona for failing to comply with its requests, bringing to 23 the number of states the department has sued to obtain the data. It also has filed suit against the District of Columbia.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said the department will "continue filing lawsuits to protect American elections," saying accurate voter rolls are the "foundation of election integrity."

Secretaries of state and state attorneys general who have pushed back against the effort say it violates federal privacy law, which protects the sharing of individual data with the government, and would run afoul of their own state laws that restrict what voter information can be released publicly.

Some of the data the Justice Department is seeking includes names, dates of birth, residential addresses, driver's license numbers and partial Social Security numbers. ...


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-10 01:21 PM | Reply

States Rights Republicans no longer exist.

That sure didn't take long.

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-10 02:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

They were shown the videos.

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-10 03:31 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort