Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Sunday, January 25, 2026

Outraged critics accused President Donald Trump of "whitewashing history" on Friday ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

The City of Philadelphia is suing the Trump administration after the National Park Service removed a long-standing exhibit on slavery in the city's Independence National Historical Park. https://cnn.it/4jSDTZQ

[image or embed]

-- CNN (@cnn.com) Jan 23, 2026 at 4:47 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

... Outraged critics accused President Donald Trump of "whitewashing history" ...

In order to control the future, Pres Trump needs to rewrite the past.

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-25 03:42 AM | Reply

No matter how hard you try, you can NEVER out run the stima of your continued vacation from moral decency.

After all you've murdered and continue your crimes against humanity by murdering all over the world.

More importantly, everyone already knows.

#2 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-01-25 07:33 AM | Reply

Has the 300 lb sack of---------- erased Herman Cain from history yet?

#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-01-25 08:56 AM | Reply

#3 He erased him from Earth.

These snowflakes at the Heritage Foundation get the big sads when they realize their ancestors were utter pieces of ---- and attempt to erase history.

"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past,"

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-01-26 08:14 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past,"

You make a good point.

say can you tell me what percent of southern families owned slaves?

#5 | Posted by Tor at 2026-01-27 12:23 PM | Reply

say can you tell me what percent of southern families owned slaves?

#5 | POSTED BY TOR

Sorry. We would like to help you but they took down all the exhibit's monuments and websites that had that information. At least that is what they are trying to do.

But your personal AI has that answer for you.

So the question really is how many do YOU think it was and why do you think it is significant?

#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-27 12:30 PM | Reply

say can you tell me what percent of southern families owned slaves?

POSTED BY TOR AT 2026-01-27 12:23 PM | REPLY

Their entire society was based on slave labor. What a dumb question.

#7 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-01-27 12:42 PM | Reply

You're right and it turns out the plantation owners you think were common in the south were about 1% of white people in the south.

the about 24% more owned slaves but they were for the most part less than three and they lived and worked in the same home as the owners.

the important thing to remember is that while rich people owned slaves a clear majority of white house holds in the old south didn't and didn't benefit from slavery either since slave labor was their competition.

Now are my numbers off?

maybe I didn't use AI today I used my memory.

You want to correct me go ahead.

#8 | Posted by Tor at 2026-01-27 06:41 PM | Reply

"the important thing to remember is that while rich people owned slaves a clear majority of white house holds in the old south didn't"

Slaves are expensive. That's like saying 1930s rich people owned cars, but a majority of households didn't.

"and didn't benefit from slavery either since slave labor was their competition."

They didn't have the economic wherewithal to benefit from slavery.
You're taking an economic reality and building a moral judgment off of it.
I will demonstrate by way of example.
How many Southern Baptists owned slaves, when the Southern Baptist schism occurred over the issue of slavery?
If the non-slave-owning Christians in the South didn't support slavery, the schism wouldn't have given rise to a new church called the Southern Baptists. That sect would have been called the Slaver Baptists or something like that.
But that's not what happened. The Baptist church split over the issue of racial slavery, and the pro-slavery church called itself the Southern Baptists.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-27 06:57 PM | Reply

I'm talking about an proto-Orwellian society where any white man who spoke out against slavery could die vanish or be financially ruined overnight.

They literally compelled poor white to be part of slave patrols in part because they knew this would make them all morally compromised.

You know who didn't have to patrol?

rich slave owners.

#10 | Posted by Tor at 2026-01-27 07:14 PM | Reply

I'm not here to say Capitalism doesn't victimize poor people, Tor.

Regardless of why the South is deeply racist, deeply racist it is.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-27 07:21 PM | Reply

This isn't a capitalism matter this is a matter of people not knowing their history because it's convenient to pretend like every white person in the south lived in a mansion supported by hundreds of slaves when that simply wasn't true.

Even going to the wind did the non-slave owning majority of families dirty.

#12 | Posted by Tor at 2026-01-27 07:25 PM | Reply

"Even going to the wind did the non-slave owning majority of families dirty."

Maybe you shouldn't look to romance movies for your accurate representation of history?

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-01-27 08:39 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort