I think that the injection of AI into American life is way premature and fueled by someone's greed.
#2 | Posted by Zed

Agreed.
Did any practicing physicians ask for this?
I doubt it.

Honestly that should not be too hard. The domains are highly segregated and specific. We ran speech to text on Op Reports nearly thirty years ago because the vocabulary is so tight compared to normal spoken English.

"Training a model for cancer detection using annotated MRI data is a data science 1 topic, college Jr. level."

Radiologist told me his front office girls could spot cancer in an X-ray, after seeing so many of them.

This was back when R2 and SecondLook was becoming a thing, thirty-ish years ago. So maybe the front office girls are dumber now.

The biggest unresolved legal issue around AI in medicine has always been:
If AI gets it wrong, who do you put on the stand in the malpractice trial?

A doctor, you can ask them what they were thinking, and how they came up with whatever procedure they tried, was it supported by the literature or their training.

AI can't explain how it got its answer. The hidden layers are just that -- hidden.

This is not to deny "hidden layers" in the human brain -- implicit bias, all kinds of fun things.

But that's a separate problem.