Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, March 19, 2026

Paige Masten: North Carolina is prepared to partner with the Trump administration to scrub alleged noncitizens from its voter rolls ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

A federal appeals court delivered a win for voters Tuesday, rejecting a Republican-backed lawsuit that sought to force Arizona to aggressively purge its voter rolls based on unproven claims of widespread voter fraud. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/ ...

[image or embed]

-- Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social) Mar 18, 2026 at 12:32 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More: Other states, such as Texas, have already begun working with DHS to mass-verify the citizenship status of their voters through SAVE. Election officials cite this as a reason why North Carolina should join in. The problem is, many of those states have encountered serious issues with the database.

"After running its entire voter list " more than 18 million records " through the SAVE database, the office identified 2,724 potential noncitizens registered to vote in Texas," Executive Director Sam Hayes said in a press release.

That's only 0.015% of the state's registered voters. But the real number of noncitizen voters in Texas is even smaller than that, because the SAVE database keeps making mistakes, an investigation by ProPublica and The Texas Tribune found. In Texas, the database incorrectly flagged hundreds of voters as potential noncitizens, with one county reporting an error rate of at least 14%.

Missouri had similar problems. In St. Louis County, the state's most populous county, around 35% of those initially flagged by SAVE were in fact registered at naturalization ceremonies, The New York Times reported. In Boone County, home to the University of Missouri, more than half the voters identified as noncitizens were actually citizens.

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-03-19 09:30 AM | Reply

NC plan to scrub voter rolls was a disaster?
That's a feature, not a bug.

Ten bucks says Big Black Boaz loses his right to vote*.
*Offer not valid if Boaz couldn't vote in the first place because of a felony conviction like one in three Black men.

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-19 10:34 AM | Reply

Would it really be that difficult to start fresh and everybody register again, this time without any AVR hooha?
It would be the only way to be sure.

#3 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-20 01:26 PM | Reply

(
Democracy Maps | Automatic Voter Registration
Movement Advancement Project |
https://www.lgbtmap.org democracy-maps automati...
Automatic voter registration (AVR) is a policy that automatically registering eligible voters through their interactions with state agencies.
)

#4 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-20 01:28 PM | Reply

1) make a bunch of automatic registrations
2) shut down counting on -------- day, figure out which ones didn't vote
3) vote for them in afterhours dump. exclude observers.
4) profit

#5 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-20 01:32 PM | Reply

Fact:

Republicans can only win when people are prevented from voting.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-20 01:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

It would be the only way to be sure.

#3 | Posted by john_savage2

Until Republicans can provide reasonable evidence of significant voter fraud, nobody should care what you think. At this point you people are working on nothing but dog whistle speculation. You're trying to shove through a supposed solution to a non existent problem.

You'll keep lying about your intent. But really, you're just trying to make voting more difficult, hoping it helps MAGA maintain control.

#7 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2026-03-20 05:05 PM | Reply

Hey Republicans.

Tell us why you don't support Free National Voter ID

Thanks.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-20 05:11 PM | Reply

"shut down counting on -------- day, figure out which ones didn't vote
3) vote for them in afterhours dump"

And if TWO PEOPLE find out by checking, your entire system is busted. And if your voting percentage is an outlier, it triggers an investigation.

Folks who believe it's easy to commit vote fraud have no idea what they're talking about.

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-20 05:26 PM | Reply

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

#10 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 11:46 AM | Reply

Disallowing evidence does not disprove evidence

#11 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 11:47 AM | Reply

Flush the rolls, they are compromised. Period.

#12 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 11:48 AM | Reply

Daddysfist, how many times have you been flushed from this site?

#13 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-21 11:50 AM | Reply

Hitler plugs ship toilets with his tampoons

#14 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 12:02 PM | Reply

" Flush the rolls, they are compromised. Period."

Unless folks are voting when they shouldn't, they're not compromised. They may be bloated, but that's a completely different problem.

#15 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-21 12:04 PM | Reply

Daddysfist is the pathetic PWZ reject who should've snuffed it decades ago.

#16 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2026-03-21 12:20 PM | Reply

They may be bloated
#15 | Posted by Danforth

...but def not compromised. Hmm.
What do you mean by "bloated"?

#17 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 02:36 PM | Reply

"What do you mean by "bloated"?"

Do you know anyone who's ever moved, and contacted the OLD voting place to take their name off the registry?

I don't either.

#18 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-21 03:14 PM | Reply

"...but def not compromised."

The defining difference being did anyone cast an illegal vote?

There are other problems, of course: mailing costs for non-existent voters is certainly one of them. But multiple USPS rejections, coupled with no votes for a decade (for example) should purge folks from the rolls. I've got no problem with that.

#19 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-21 03:20 PM | Reply

^I thought you might have meant-
US Attorney's Office, Western District of North Carolina
United States Department of Justice (.gov)
https://www.justice.gov usao-wdnc us-attorneys-offi...
Dec 2, 2025 " ... voter registration." The DMV also found a "system error" that lasted for three months and permitted ineligible individuals to register to vote.

#20 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 03:22 PM | Reply

cis.org

Motor-Voter Law Often Lures Non-Citizens into Voting Illegally
Voting by the non-citizen mayor of Coldwater, Kan., highlights a problem created by Congress

#21 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 03:23 PM | Reply

Oregon Motor Voter program updated after audit finds issues
KOIN.com
https://www.koin.com news oregon oregon-motor...
Feb 4, 2026 " ... adopted new administrative rules for the Oregon Motor Voter program after more than 1600 ineligible voters were registered to vote.

#22 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 03:24 PM | Reply

All I'm saying, is the 'motor voter' act signed by bill c. was always a device to facilitate erecti0n tampering.

#23 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 03:26 PM | Reply

"after more than 1600 ineligible voters were registered to vote."

How many of them VOTED?

I agree on tightening the procedures...but how many of them VOTED?

The KS mayor represented ONE instance, and iirc, it's Kobach's first case against an illegal immigrant since his famous debacle of telling the KS legislature he had "over 100 cases ready to file", and ended up $4 million later with ONE illegal immigrant convicted.

#24 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-21 03:31 PM | Reply

" The DMV also found a "system error" that lasted for three months and permitted ineligible individuals to register to vote."

So basically, they screwed up, fixed it, no one cast a single vote illegally...

...and that's proof to you the system doesn't work?!?

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-21 03:33 PM | Reply

The defining difference being did anyone cast an illegal vote?
#19 | Posted by Danforth
shake shake grr grrr

let that go; of course you don't notice late-night zombie ballots counted in secret and shredded in the morning.
Paco12345 doesn't even know he's on the roll.

#26 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 03:34 PM | Reply

"Motor-Voter Law Often Lures Non-Citizens into Voting Illegally"

"Often"

A weasel word, with the author as barometer.

If it was "often", a guy looking for it under every rock would've found more than ONE.

#27 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-21 03:36 PM | Reply

states rights!!
we can slant our 3rection any way we see fit!
DAN will never know!

#28 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 03:43 PM | Reply

A weasel word,

...like "bloated"?

#29 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-21 04:20 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort