Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Sarah Fitzpatrick, The Atlantic investigative journalist behind last week's bombshell story about FBI Director Kash Patel, has said she has since been "inundated" with messages from new sources corroborating her reporting.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

"I stand by every single word of this report ... I have been inundated by additional sourcing going up to the highest levels of the government, thanking us for doing the work, providing additional corroborating information." Sarah Fitzpatrick on Kash Patel: www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/202 ...

[image or embed]

-- Anne Applebaum (@anneapplebaum.bsky.social) Apr 24, 2026 at 1:44 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More: "My response is that I stand by every single word of this report," she said. "We were very diligent. We were very careful. It went through multiple levels of editing, review, care.

"And I think one of the things that has been most gratifying, after " immediately after the story published was, I have been inundated by additional sourcing going up to the highest levels of the government, thanking us for doing the work, providing additional corroborating information."

Fitzpatrick said that she used more than two dozen sources for her original report, characterizing the officials she spoke to as "people who felt that not only was this conduct embarrassing, unbecoming, but that it was a national security vulnerability, and that Americans were perhaps less safe as a result."

Asked about some of the more shocking details in her report, she said: "I had never heard anything like this as a reporter, and I think I spent a very long time, a very diligent amount of time checking it out because it was so explosive.

"And I think the fact that this was known throughout the FBI, throughout the Justice Department, that it reached the White House is because it was so alarming. And people were really frightened."

She said some of her sources were not merely panicking but profoundly emotional in expressing their concerns to her, describing them as "grown men who have done nothing but counterintelligence and solving some of the worst-of-the-worst crimes who are not easily scared, intimidated, concerned."

"They were frightened," she said. "And that really stuck with me."

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-04-24 10:34 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

What I find most surprising about Hegseth and Patel being part of this cabal is Trump has a low opinion of Drunks, after his brother Fred drank himself to death.

It becomes less surprising when you understand Trump is purely a transactionalist.

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-04-29 04:46 PM | Reply

Posted by qcp at 03:33 PM | 2 COMMENTS

"says"

#3 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-04-29 09:39 PM | Reply

" says"

Riiiiiiiiiight.

Because, as everyone knows, saying something against Team Trump will never ever ever ever EVER put your life in danger.

(~Said nobody, ever)

#4 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-04-29 10:14 PM | Reply

#4 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-04-29 10:14 PM | Reply | Flag

Because "says" is generally the code word for - we don't have anything... Deal with it faggatt

#5 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-04-30 01:51 AM | Reply

" Because "says" is generally the code word for - we don't have anything."

In what bizarro world, dumfuq?

She basically claimed Kash is a drunk, then scads more people came forward agreeing with her.

And, hilariously ... you can't handle the truth.

#6 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-04-30 02:05 AM | Reply

Because "says" is generally the code word for - we don't have anything.

Of course, this d*&^less wonder pulls this card.

What's obvious to every other sane, rational person alive is hidden to this dips*&^.

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2026-04-30 02:50 AM | Reply

Sort of like me saying I was a great student when I first went to college, gambling on the hopes that no one remembers me...but still, Discovery...sending people subpoenas having them testify in open court or in a deposition to the truth...I would bet Kash would be mighty embarrassed, and a lot poorer, for he is liable for defamation when he takes after those who testify.
(Gee...all those hours watching Law and Order is paying off...I understood what is going on, I think).

#8 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-04-30 07:48 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort