This is so "unrelated" people can live together. The tax laws, as usual, will recognize the first spouse, and allow for as much play-acting folks want.

"Why do you ignore 50% of Hitler's chosen title?"

For the same reason I don't believe Saddam's Republican Guard were Republicans.

"If the next two years allows the DSA to run rampant, 2028 will be up for grabs again."

What part of a 50-seat majority don't you understand?

The margins are large enough no small caucus can control it.

FFS, doesn't anybody understand how Congress operates?!?

"Angie Nixon, a DSA member, came within 3 points of her Republican opponent in Florida."

Again, a one or two seat majority is a world of difference compared to a 50-seat majority.

"as far as I can tell, none of them are socialist either."

Why are you ignoring 50% of their chosen title?

"What they do. Without a doubt."

Odd. The German guy with the funny mustache never ruled a single day as a Socialist. Instead, he jailed or murdered the leading Socialists.

But that name was in the Party ... so they could trick others to get power. Once in charge ... dictatorship.

"Let's put a number to it."

Fox did.

Five.

Who, in a 50-seat majority, will be relatively powerless.

"the following representative elects all advocate nationalizing certain industries:"

Six folks, in a 50+ majority?!?

JFC, for someone who pretends to be a Constitutional expert, you don't seem to know how the House of Representatives operates.

"Plenty of DSA Dems won"

Nowhere near enough to drive any agenda.
~Math

"(DJT) just fell from $175 per share to $5.00.

Well, since inception.

Today, it opened at $5.95 and closed at $4.46, a one-day drop of over 24.5%.

"The DSA, Megan Romer, sounds clueless."

And once in Congress, they'll be the small group gathering in the corner.

Every sizable governing board has them: a handful of folks with outsized noise and undersized results.

Look at committee assignments to measure how seriously they're taken.

"2028 will be a red wave."

Shouldn't you be claiming a million ballots were stolen in Texas?

" ... cant speak for everywhere but in Texas, conservatives lost because over 1.5 million people didn't show up to vote compared to the 2024 tally."

Well, the votes certainly wouldn't have broken 95-5 for Paxton, so he still would've lost.
~Math

"What's your problem with AOC?"

Nothing. She's sharp, and a hard worker. I admire both.

I simply believe other possible candidates have better resumes, and wider appeal.

New Yorkers, God bless them, believe NYC is the center of the universe. I don't believe she's as popular across the country as her East Coast sycophants do.

"Paxton was a liability for the republicans."

And not just in Texas.

He made a great poster boy for the Democrats.

" I mean, you even lost Texas"

Have Republicans claimed 1.3 million illegals voted yet?

"In primary polling she's currently 4th."

Usually a losing position.

Why don't you comment on her committee assignments or laws passed?

You seem to be avoiding the salient facts.

"guarantee??"

Yes, guarantee. I remember it vividly.

"a vaxx that didn't work"

Thanks for admitting you'd flunk a Virology 101 midterm.

"They haven't been this cheerful since they watched a peaceful debater get murdered on a college campus."

What a riot, coming from someone who cheered Paul Pelosi's attacker.

" none of the candidates who identify as Democratic Socialists seem to want to follow that path."

So do you analyze them based on what they call themselves, or by their actions once in power?

" feel free to list AOC's committee assignments, and list the laws she's authored. It's embarrassing."

Committee assignments are the barometer of trust and sober reflection.

For example, someone with Trump's childish understanding of tariffs would keep him off of EVERY committee using Math.

But I'd definitely vote to put him in charge of party decorations.

(Cups and ice, maybe? He's certainly a feeb.)

" I'd like to hope primary voters would know better but who knows."

"Primary voters" chose Donald Trump. And yesterday, your votes went to enable him and those who support him.

Is "not knowing any better" your excuse?

" she's considered a possible front runner for the party for 2028 POTUS"

By Republicans, who thought they'd win last night.

"They will all be sworn in come January."

Again...never heard of any of them.

Regardless, I'm not worried. Frankly, I've dealt with small bands of idiots in every board situation I've ever been part of.

For example, feel free to list AOC's committee assignments, and list the laws she's authored. It's embarrassing.

Meanwhile, you're pretending fringe aren't treated like fringe.

My lived experiences disagree.

"There is no way that is the case."

That's why I asked what you believe.

Even your most extreme view (one side does it 33% more than the other),means it would take 700 instances to net 100 votes.

Based on current numbers, it would take Texas over 900 years to find that many instances.