Every lawyer and judge associated with this should be disbarred and/or removed.

Yeah we just don't invite my uncle and his wife, the only MAGAts in our extended family, to gatherings anymore. No one wants to have to hear their BS. Their kids and grandkids show up every year and we have a wonderful time.

Kind of telling that they chose to spend time with the rest of the family rather than their parents.

He is on the trail though. His specter will be in every voting booth in the country. The blowout will be because of him and his disastrous failure of a presidency.

Yeah let us know when Stacey Plaskett spends Thanksgiving with Epstien or a few hours alone in a room with one of his victims.

I think that Trump vetoing the Epstein bill remains a possibility.

Definitely but it passed both chambers of Congress with veto proof majorities. Assuming no one has a change of heart (big assumption, I know) his veto won't matter.

It's a good start. This only applied to a few schools.

Glad to see he's concentrating on the most important issues we face. /s

More: As Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, explains in the court's opinion, Texas lawmakers initially "didn't have much appetite to redistrict on purely partisan grounds" - even as Trump urged them to do so. But Texas Republicans appear to have changed their mind after the Justice Department sent a letter last July to Texas's top officials, which demanded that the state redraw several districts to change their racial makeup.

That letter, as I'll explain in more detail below, misread a federal appeals court opinion to mean that the state was required to remake its maps. According to Judge Brown's opinion, "it's challenging to unpack the DOJ Letter because it contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors." He added that "even attorneys employed by the Texas Attorney General - who professes to be a political ally of the Trump Administration - describe the DOJ Letter as legally unsound,' baseless,' erroneous,' ham-fisted,' and a mess.'"

In reality, the Supreme Court has long held that "if a legislature gives race a predominant role in redistricting decisions, the resulting map" is subject to the most skeptical level of constitutional review and "may be held unconstitutional." When the Justice Department told Texas to redraw several of its congressional districts to change their racial makeup, it ordered Texas to give "race a predominant role." Oops.

More: Minority Leader Chuck Schumer came to the floor at 5:18 p.m., just hours after the House resoundingly passed the bill, and asked for it to be deemed passed by the Senate as soon as it was processed by the House.

No one objected.

The unanimous action by the Senate means there will be no amendments or changes to the bill as House Speaker Mike Johnson and other members of his Republican leadership team had been urging.

Following the decision, Johnson told reporters on Tuesday night he is "deeply disappointed" the Senate approved the Epstein files release bill without making any changes.

Trump said on Monday that he will sign the bill should it reach his desk.

"I'm all for it," Trump said.

But in a post on his social media platform Tuesday afternoon, the president said he doesn't "care when the Senate passes the House Bill, whether tonight, or at some other time in the near future," and that he wants Republicans to stay focused on his agenda.

"I just don't want Republicans to take their eyes off all of the Victories that we've had, including THE GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL, Closed Borders, No Men in Women's Sports or Transgender for Everyone, ending DEI, stopping Biden's Record Setting Inflation, Biggest Tax and Regulation Cuts in History, stopping EIGHT Wars, rebuilding our Military, being RESPECTED by every Country in the World, having Trillions of Dollars INVESTED in the U.S.A., having created the "HOTTEST" Country anywhere in the World, and even delivering a HUGE DEFEAT to the Democrats on the Shutdown," Trump said in his post.

Virginia, full to the brim with disillusioned federal employees, also plans to redistrict favoring blue.

Silly MAGAts, tricks are for kids.

From another article but pertinent: "The public perception of this case is that it's about politics," Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote in his decision, which was joined by Judge David Guaderrama, an Obama appointee. "To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics."

The impetus for Texas' new maps was a letter from Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, that argued, erroneously, that the state's "coalition" districts those with majority-minority populations where that majority consists of more than one minority group were unconstitutional following a decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Petteway v. Galveston County.

"Any mention of majority White Democrat districts"which DOJ presumably would have also targeted if its aims were partisan rather than racial"was conspicuously absent," Brown wrote.

Redistricting was added to the special legislative session called by Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, two days after Dhillon sent her letter.

"In other words, the Governor explicitly directed the Legislature to redistrict based on race," Brown wrote. "In press appearances, the Governor plainly and expressly disavowed any partisan objective and instead repeatedly stated that his goal was to eliminate coalition districts and create new majority-Hispanic districts."

Brown's decision eviscerates Dhillon's letter as containing "so many factual, legal, and typographical errors" that it is "challenging to unpack." The main problem is that the letter completely misinterprets the Petteway decision by arguing that its finding that the Voting Rights Act cannot require the drawing of coalition districts means that coalition districts are therefore unconstitutional.

"Petteway's holding that [Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act] does not require [coalition] districts' has no bearing on the permissibility of such districts as a matter of legislative choice or discretion,'" Brown wrote, quoting from other legal precedents.

Brown goes on to point out that Dhillon's explanations for which districts were unconstitutional coalition districts included multiple factual inaccuracies, including the background about how the district lines were initially drawn. He also notes what is missing from her letter.

Now he's a good cop.

More: Online influencer Andrew Tate, a self-described misogynist who has millions of young male followers, was facing allegations of sex trafficking women in three countries when he and his brother left their home in Romania to visit the United States.

"The Tates will be free, Trump is the president. The good old days are back," Tate posted on X before the trip in February " one of many times he has sung the president's praises to his fans.

But when the Tate brothers arrived by private plane in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, they immediately found themselves in the crosshairs of law enforcement once more, as Customs and Border Protection officials seized their electronic devices.

This time, they had a powerful ally come to their aid. Behind the scenes, the White House intervened on their behalf.

Interviews and records reviewed by ProPublica show a White House official told senior Department of Homeland Security officials to return the devices to the brothers several days after they were seized. The official who delivered the message, Paul Ingrassia, is a lawyer who previously represented the Tate brothers before joining the White House, where he was working as its DHS liaison.

In his written request, a copy of which was reviewed by ProPublica, Ingrassia chided authorities for taking the action, saying the seizure of the Tates' devices was not a good use of time or resources. The request to return the electronics to the Tates, he emphasized, was coming from the White House.

More: The L.A.-based civil rights attorney added that he believes the 45-year-old has become emboldened by what he does and sees other ICE agents doing on a day-to-day basis.

"It's gotten so bad where he thinks he can now turn his own block into his personal ICE checkpoint," Kirakosian said. "I don't know how much worse the situation is going to get, honestly. This kid could've been shot."

More: But the problem for Trump is that it's not working. His poll numbers continue to dive, and his numbers on immigration " once a strength " are now jarringly underwater. Just this month, an NBC poll showed that by a 54-44 margin, Americans think his sending "federal agents and National Guard troops to various cities around the country to fight crime and immigration" is not justified. An Associated Press/Norc poll showed 42 percent of Americans approved of his handling of immigration, a new low. AP/Norc also found that support among Hispanics, a key factor in Trump's 2024 election win, has fallen 19 points since January.

It turns out that Americans, who have long had conflicting feelings about immigration, don't much like the president's approach to it. They don't like being told one thing - in this case, that federal agents are going into cities to target dangerous criminals - then seeing something entirely different. They don't like people, including American citizens, being confronted and detained simply because of the color of their skin. They don't like masked federal agents gleefully stomping on our core values.

I live in Charlotte, people are NOT happy about this circus coming to town.

Good op-ed from today's local paper that local "christians" won't read but should.

she is MAGA and a Rep that might be persuaded to change a vote on the Epstein files.

They already voted, she didn't change her vote.

Lauren Boebert is a "key lawmaker?" K.

I've used Firefox since the early 00's. Chrome is garbage.

Even more: That wasn't the only message that suggested Trump and Epstein were still spending time together. In another email chain from December 2017, a guest of Epstein's claimed they didn't want to risk running into Trump at Epstein's Paris apartment. In other emails sent just days after the presidential election, Epstein claimed he was headed for New York as "Trump gives many new things to do," and later said he was visiting Trump Tower.

More: Buried in a batch of thousands of documents released Wednesday by the GOP-led House Committee on Oversight and Reform, one email chain between Epstein and someone called "Faith Kates," likely referring to the founder of NEXT Model Management, suggested that the convicted sex offender was still hanging out with Trump long after the president claims he cut ties.

In the emails that took place on the morning of November 23, 2017, Kates asked where Epstein was spending his Thanksgiving, and the convicted sex offender responded: "Eva."

Kates responded that "Glenn" must be there, indicating that Epstein was with Eva Andersson-Dubin and her husband, Glenn Dubin. In addition to helping to broker the sale of Dubin's hedge fund to JP Morgan, Epstein had previously dated Andersson-Dubin and was the godfather of the couple's children.

Kates asked, "who else is down there?"

Epstein replied: "david fizel, hanson, trump."

"Have fun!!!" Kates replied.

#2,

The House will vote on it, maybe today, but it'll never get through the Senate. As long as Trump has a stranglehold on the GOP we'll never see those files.