" most of the contested states are within 1-4 pts. I think that bodes pretty well for Harris."
Even better: NONE of the polls are accounting for pissed off women, since there's no way to model it based on the prior electorate.
Hence red KS had polls which were way off, as did OH's abortion rights 60% threshold, and some statewide office in AL, where the woman running on women's rights won, despite the polls. And recently a Trump +29 district went for the (R), but only by 9 points.
Polls were waaay off, and the results all favored the "left" outcome by 5-10 points. Of, in the latter above, 20.
Women's rights on the ballot in AZ, FL, NV, MT, MO, NE, CO, and AR.
MT will help Tester. AZ and NV will benefit the bottom lines, NE will guarantee that one electoral vote from Omaha. FL may actually come into play, and Hawley will have a tougher race in MO.
Ultimately, Roevember will produce a Blue Tsunami. Sweetest of all will be starting out the night with the networks calling FL for Mucarsel, and NC for Stein.
" that the problem at the border and 10M+ illegals in the last 4 years was 100% caused by the Democrats and could have been solved by the Democrats at any time but they chose not to because this is what they wanted."
Republicans wrote their dream bill, and admitted it was better than they'd be able to get under Trump due to parliamentary restrictions.
Trump told Rs to sabotage it, so he'd have it for a campaign issue.
In the real world, if one side unilaterally walks away from a deal, they own the fallout.
If not for Trump, the border would have millions of more dollars and hundreds of more staff. But for Trump.
Once again, The Party of Responsibility refuses to take their own responsibility.