"there are still no specific actions mentioned that would constitute collusion."

Then you didn't read the full thing. There were over 100 contacts.

"even with it being a biased crap report..."

It was REPUBLICANS, led by the current Secretary of State. And they only admitted WHAT THEY ABSOLUTELY HAD TO to save face.

You just can't handle the truth. You never even read the report until tonight.

" you guys tried for years - but, you still failed."

Just admit you're afraid to read the link I provided, and leave it at that.

Again, YOU'RE DENYING WHAT REPUBLICANS ADMITTED.

Now go get your shine box.

"For the sake of argument, let's say that people in Trump's orbit did meet with Russians on occasion."

Republicans called that A GRAVE SECURITY THREAT. Were those Republicans lying?

"What specific acts resulted from these meetings?"

One was Manafort gave his puppet masters in Russia insider campaign polling information. Remind us how much the Trump campaign was paying Manafort?

"I probably interact with a Russian every few days in my normal life"

Do you find the need to lie about it at every turn?

That seems to be the salient point, wouldn't you say?

"It's one of those lies that everyone knows is a lie when it's told, including the person doing the lying..."

And that's YOUR lane, right?

"we still have no evidence of collusion"

Not for lack of trying.

You didn't read the link, did you? And after asking for a link.

What a classless bore.

"What did they admit?"

They admitted you're a dupe.

And here you are...proving them right.

"How does the current economy do either one of those things?"

Carried interest, GRATs, and the fact investments are treated more favorably than labor.

"What did they admit? You have the files now - link to it."

I already did, Einstein; read it. A "grave security threat"...said REPUBLICANS.

"Wow, all the Russian collusion information is being released."

Republicans ADMITTED it.

And here you are, lying about it. Denying what they admitted.

What a good water carrier you are!!!

" ... a new leader from the only entity with trust and approval ratings lower than the Democrat party itself - the MSM. Oh wait, you just did that."

But enough about Pete Hegseth.

"But his chats..."

And what's the other one???

LOCK HIM UP!

"This Incompetence is totally unexpected from Hegseth!"

NO ONE in the chat warned of the discussion method. They are ALL incompetent. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM should've demanded a skif.

The fact NO ONE did, means EVERYONE should be fired.

"Karoline Leavitt already said..."

Baghdad Barb

"More mass immigration and crime?"

Desperation is when your central point is a lie.

"Nobody was texting war plans."

Riiiiiiiight. And Team Trump never met with Russians in 2016.

"Anyone who voted for Trump did so with the understanding that they Federal budget would have to be reduced at any cost/measure"

Well, since Trump is going to spend trillions more in tax giveaways, they're all math morons, aren't they?

Here's a hint for all the dumfuqs: the deficit isn't going to be reduced. A trillion in spending on everyday workers will be slashed, while FOUR TIMES that amount will be newly borrowed, mostly to give away in tax cuts to the world's wealthiest 1%.

Did you vote for that?

Don't we have a poster who regularly screeches about LAWFARE?

Doesn't that same poster also screech about CENSORSHIP? And eschew WEAPONIZATION of the DOJ???

Here's the intersection of all three...where is the screeching?

FFS...where is the peep???

"the Russia Hoax."
~Trump

Hoax! Right!!! It was a HOAX.
~MAGAts

"#79 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE '

(Unrecognized) Newsworthy Flag.

Hegseth, Vice President Vance, White House national security adviser Mike Waltz, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Department Secretary Scott Bessent, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe all appear to have been among the participants. So too, apparently, were key figures in Trump's orbit including White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and key adviser Stephen Miller.

And NOT ONE OF THEM even SUGGESTED Signal was a bad idea.

They are ALL incompetent. Every last one of them.

" why did this scumbag not warn everybody?"

Um, he did.

And "scumbag" would only apply if he leaked any of the classified information moronically put on Signal.

Telling, though: you don't blame the perpetrator, you blame the messenger.

"Hillary had classified info on an email server "

Which was bad back then.

Why is it okay now?

Of course, it's laughable: you never let go of it...until a Republican did worse. Then, you picked up your water pail, and started carrying.

"You liberals are always trying to protect the world with OUR constitution."

These folks were on American soil. Were they legally allowed due process, or not?

Constitution says yes. You say no...while invoking the Constitution.

------ all the way off.