Hey raetard, the morons you supported are sitting at a 27% approval rating - and that's CNN's numbers. You may want to sit this one out.

#41 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

I only supported them because they're better than Trump.

Gotta love this stupid sack of s%^* telling someone else to sit this one out.

5 anonymous sources ffs...

#21 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRDS

You stupid f^*%s responded this way throughout his first term.

And conveniently ignored when the stories were confirmed true the vast majority of the time.

lol they still think elections will be valid from here on out.

How cute.

Hey blues^*+bag, just admit you want it that way.

Because we all know when it gets really bad, you're still not going to speak out against it.

You'll support it. Openly once it becomes palatable enough.

So this is just semantics and the federal department of education is worthless and unnecessary, so shutting it down is just basic common sense, got it.

#28 | POSTED BY THEBULL

No, idiot. Shutting it down will ensure things get worse because there's nothing pushing states to get better. There's nothing forcing states to educate kids with special needs.

Righties really are just stupid.

Is that why New Mexico (a tried and true Democrat stronghold) always comes in dead ass last in the rankings JPW?

#26 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES

That's why the majority of the best ranked are blue New England states and the majority of the worst are red states.

I get that you're rather dumb, but even someone as stupid as you knows cherry picking is dishonest.

Return education to the States, the slush fund is closed.

#1 | POSTED BY BLUEWAFFLES

It is mostly with the states you f%^*ing idiot. Why else do you think red state s^*+holes are always so bad at education along with everything else.

It's pretty apparent that they have their heads up their a-s-s and need to be over hauled.

#7 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

He really is this stupid, isn't he?

anything that cuts waste and makes government more efficient they are against.

#40 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

lol this stupid f^*% actually believes that's what they're doing.

Do you have trouble walking and chewing at the same time?

Remember when government picking winners and losers was a bad thing?

Mail if fraught with SS fraud

Funny how these idiots keep using that word, but don't seem to actually know what it means.

When are we going to stop acting as if their stated puprose is their atual purpose?

The correct question is will DOGE direct more money to insider pockets than is currently being spent?

I hope my understanding is wrong.

#288 | Posted by BellRinger

I'm sorry, but the only conclusion I can take from this disingenuous question is you're stupid or dishonest.

#280 | Posted by rstybeach11

See above.

#275 | Posted by rstybeach11

You should link whatever AI platform you're using to generate those posts.

On a case-by-case basis only after proven that the lender violated lending law and/or mislead a borrower. It was never set up for any kind of blanket forgiveness like it was some kind of class-action lawsuit.

#274 | Posted by BellRinger

Dude. The original forgiveness WAS because of a class action lawsuit IIRC.

The problem has been the enactment of the judgement has been stop start because some administrations (*cough*repuglicans*gouch*) want to use student loans as a debt prison to fund tax cuts.

Hence why DoE under Biden could grant forgiveness to people waiting for it because DeVry was a POS.

Well, that's a crucial piece of clarification.

#271 | Posted by BellRinger

That is something I stated then and is something I've reiterated over time on at least a few occasions.

If that's new to you, maybe you should ease off the trigger.

You haven't logically refuted a single point on this thread

Or...ever...

and have done so without having to provide a bunch of left-wing links

There's the usual cop out.

So stop with the libelous accusation.

#261 | Posted by BellRinger

Doth protest too much.

I was mocking the banality of accusing JPW of being a --------- hound, you complete and absolute clown-shht.

#256 | Posted by BellRinger

You've made those remarks yourself when cornered.

Less frequently than lfthnds*(&bag and fortdumbf(*&, but only because you're less easily cornered.

But you've still gone there rather than fade gracefully into the sunset.

So spare us any supposed claims of "mocking the banality" of your own behavior. It only signals you're on the ropes and are hoping to ingratiate your way into a bit of breathing space.

It's hilarious to me to watch hard-core lefties turn against Schumer for preventing his party from being responsible for a government shut-down.

You all keep being you. It's priceless.

#254 | Posted by BellRinger

LOL it's hilarious watching you spout ignorance while smugly acting as if you're informed.

1. I'm not a "hard-core leftist"
2. My dislike of Schumer and desire for his retirement long precedes any recent events
3. Of course, you swallow the Repub line that it would be a Dem caused shutdown

Go to bed. You're on the ropes.

Which is every bit as accurate of a statement as you being accused of working middle stall ---------- at truck stops.

#248 | Posted by BellRinger

Swing and a miss, dips(*&.

Keeping that losing streak alive.

I am very familiar with the twisted legal justification the administration came up with to circumvent the SCOTUS ruling.

#242 | Posted by BellRinger

You don't even know how the programs work.

You aren't familiar with s(*&, other that that which comes of Trump's pie hole on a regular basis.

"I'm right and you're wrong. Nyah!" isn't a correction of anything, moron.

#250 | Posted by BellRinger

Jesus Christ what a buffoon.

No wonder you love Trump.