"It is about the comments you post."
do enlighten me...
So far my basic stance is that Trump is a horrible candidate, but the far left was to wrapped up in appeasing the extremes of their party that they fumbled what should have been a cake walk re-election.
Kamala lost because she was despite rising to VP an unknown entity and at every opportunity to show who she would be as president she failed to do so. This further distanced her from connecting with voters.
Please explain now how that makes someone a MAGAT?
"how many people who have voted for Pres-elect Trump will now try to assert they did not vote for him?"
Go look at the receipts... I posted multiple times here that I live in MA, and it was going for Harris. I hate both candidates, and my vote was going to a third party in my own private protest of not voting for either. Usually it's a throw away, but there are multiple posts discussing just how did Harris get so many less votes than Biden did four years ago. The wake up call to both parties I'm trying to send actually started to resonate a bit. Imagine now if more people did the same thing? After this election one of the major parties is being asked, why did you lose voters... If only both parties had to be doing the same thing.
If you look back at my posts you'll see that's been the common thread... the parties are out of touch with the majority of the country and beholden to extreme bases.
"why do you apparently want to divert the topic of discussion from what has been queried of you?"
There was no real discussion directed at me... Truth is just slinging insults, and asked what Trump is going to do for me...
1. this thread is about the DNC being introspective about the plunge in Latino numbers, so it's a deflection not a question.
2. I don't need to list what he'll do for me, I didn't want him, didn't vote for him.
So in a debate about why the DNC should be looking inward at why they didn't connect with various parts of the voting public I was the one staying on topic.
"It is about the comments you post."
do enlighten me...
So far my basic stance is that Trump is a horrible candidate, but the far left was to wrapped up in appeasing the extremes of their party that they fumbled what should have been a cake walk re-election.
Kamala lost because she was despite rising to VP an unknown entity and at every opportunity to show who she would be as president she failed to do so. This further distanced her from connecting with voters.
Please explain now how that makes someone a MAGAT?
"how many people who have voted for Pres-elect Trump will now try to assert they did not vote for him?"
Go look at the receipts... I posted multiple times here that I live in MA, and it was going for Harris. I hate both candidates, and my vote was going to a third party in my own private protest of not voting for either. Usually it's a throw away, but there are multiple posts discussing just how did Harris get so many less votes than Biden did four years ago. The wake up call to both parties I'm trying to send actually started to resonate a bit. Imagine now if more people did the same thing? After this election one of the major parties is being asked, why did you lose voters... If only both parties had to be doing the same thing.
If you look back at my posts you'll see that's been the common thread... the parties are out of touch with the majority of the country and beholden to extreme bases.
"why do you apparently want to divert the topic of discussion from what has been queried of you?"
There was no real discussion directed at me... Truth is just slinging insults, and asked what Trump is going to do for me...
1. this thread is about the DNC being introspective about the plunge in Latino numbers, so it's a deflection not a question.
2. I don't need to list what he'll do for me, I didn't want him, didn't vote for him.
So in a debate about why the DNC should be looking inward at why they didn't connect with various parts of the voting public I was the one staying on topic.