A new four-lane highway cutting through tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest is being built for the COP30 climate summit in the Brazilian city of Belm. It aims to ease traffic to the city, which will host more than 50,000 people - including world leaders - at the conference in November. The state government touts the highway's "sustainable" credentials, but some locals and conservationists are outraged at the environmental impact. The Amazon plays a vital role in absorbing carbon for the world and providing biodiversity, and many say this deforestation contradicts the very purpose of a climate summit.
Of course, all that changed when inspiration struck Sinclair. "I'm not an expert in the food world," she admits, "but I just figured it was something interesting to put out there." Part of Sinclair's fascination with kale stems from the word "kale" itself " she likes words and how they sound, remarking that the whole endeavor "just seemed something nutty." "It wasn't as premeditated as some people would think," Sinclair says. "I'm not that orchestrated in my thoughts. I follow my passion."
The world has once again turned a blind eye to a horrific massacre of Christians. In less than 24 hours, over 340 Christians were slaughtered in Syria's coastal region by local Muslims. Yet, there have been no mass protests, no significant media coverage, and no action from the International Criminal Court (ICC). This sickening silence reveals a troubling pattern in how global institutions and the mainstream media selectively choose which atrocities deserve attention.
HARTFORD, Conn. (CNN) - A Connecticut college student is suing the Hartford Board of Education and the city of Hartford for negligence. Nineteen-year-old Aleysha Ortiz says she graduated from high school with honors and earned a college scholarship, but she can't read or write. In some ways, Ortiz is living an American dream. The 19-year-old began her freshman year at the University of Connecticut in Hartford this past fall. read more
Bankrupt arts and crafts retailer Joann will close all of its stores, after its restructuring plans faltered and a liquidator agreed to buy its assets. Why it matters: Joann had about 800 stores and 19,000 employees when it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January, including 15,600 part-time workers.
You turn around and follow the direction of your dispatcher.
Depends upon the orders, and what level they were issued, the pilot in command is the sole arbiter, and ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight/airplane.
You may catch alot of ---- for disregarding ATC or a dispatcher, but as PIC you do have the right to reply UNABLE.
Someone? Anyone can call a pilot? Anyone? No checks, nothing? Do pilots get all kinds of prank calls? This is rather fascinating to me. I want to know!
#54 | POSTED BY YAV
Call them? No.
My understanding is that the pilots as final authority, are responsible for violating the order of the Judge.
My understanding reading the law as best I could, SCOTUS laid down it has no say in the matter of the Alien Act.
Just like an airplane, if the pilot (president) deems the the orders are against the safety of the flight (gang members) he/she can disregard those orders.
Under authority of the Act of 1798, the President, on July 14, 1945, directed the removal from the United States of all alien enemies "who shall be deemed by the Attorney General to be dangerous to the public peace and safety of the United States."
As Congress explicitly recognized in the recent Administrative Procedure Act, some statutes "preclude judicial review." Act of June 11, 1946, 10, 60 Stat. 237, 243. Barring questions of interpretation and constitutionality, 164*164 the Alien Enemy Act of 1798 is such a statute.
A war power of the President not subject to judicial review is not transmuted into a judicially reviewable action because the President chooses to have that power exercised within narrower limits than Congress authorized.
scholar.google.com
Really does seem like the court stepped over the line.
#11 | POSTED BY SNOOFY
These are all outlier lies.
More children attempt to commit suicide AFTER surgery rather than BEFORE.
Individuals who underwent gender-affirming surgery had a 12.12-fold higher suicide attempt risk than those who did not (3.47% vs. 0.29%, RR 95% CI 9.20-15.96, p < 0.0001).
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The goons who fall for this, they don't see the problem in declaring your child is straight.
I have never had to "declare" my daughters sexual/gender preferences. Have you? Have you ever had to express your child's preference?
The general point, though, is correct. If you can't say this is stupid you're part of the problem. It is genuinely stupid to ask those kinds of questions about a newborn, IMHO.
The law requesting this information is an amendment to demographic information gathered from a patient. There has been newborn demographic questions before this.
www.njleg.state.nj.us
The purpose is not to offend the patient, or the parents.
Its perfectly reasonable to request this information when the world gets offended if you don't properly address individuals. I can imagine some parent being offended if BLUE was used on a transgender female baby. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if someone would sue the hospital as trying to discriminate because of it.
So sorry, not stupid and not moronic, its the by product of hysterically extreme people, like yourself.
So the whole, "the village had to be destroyed to save it" mindset from Vietnam.
The difference here is that its not their children dying, they'd sacrifice others children, but not their own (except to be slaves to the interest on the debt, they don't care about that).
Its an evolutionary response really
You care more about dead Russians than Putin does.
~ Alexa
Thats it that all you have?
No one forced him to do that, just as no one is forcing you to use his talking points.
This is debatable, really depends upon what you mean by FORCED. Was he literally forced? No, was Putin figuratively forced? Its a reasonable argument, after East Germany went to the west, and US/NATO promised not to go further, NATO certainly did go east.
Recall Kennedy blocking Russian missiles headed for Cuba, was Kennedy forced into Nuclear confrontation? IF the world had ended that day, would you blame Kennedy or Khrushchev? If China puts nukes in Cuba, and Latin America, or say Mexico is that threat to the US?
Would the US be wrong to want to stop it?
Its really easy and brain dead to paint one side as EVIL and the other GOOD, history is much more complicated and subtle.