Lt. Colonel ML Cavanaugh: When I was an officer in the U.S. military, I abstained from voting in national elections, one small way to keep the armed forces nonpartisan. Now, to uphold that same value and prevent the military from becoming a political tool, I believe that in November, everyone - civilians, service members, veterans, everyone - should vote for whoever has the best chance to keep Donald Trump out of office.
It's a shame liberals have no objectivity in their heads whatsoever so when they see someone make a point, they immediately accept it or hate it depending on if it meets their narrative. Here, I'll take a stab at some of the statements this guy tried to use as ammunition:
"Only one candidate has suggested the execution of a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."
And multiple liberals have, in a matter of a few years, eluded to Trump should be dead..and I'm talking well-known liberals, not just some guy off the street. And to make the point even better, you can search on DR for all the times DR lib kids have made statements about wishing Trump were dead and things like that. So, if death threats are something you don't like, stop allowing your own party to do it and get away with it.
"Only one candidate has called our war dead " specifically, the Marines who fell at Belleau Wood in France during World War I " "suckers" and "losers.""
Biden himself said the military is full of stupid bastards. I'm sure liberals will say "yeah, but you are missing context, he meant it as a joke". Which would be fine, if liberals actually cared about any context from the other side. Liberals have already proven multiple times this year that many things they do need context but when attacking the other party, they refuse to accept any context. Go ahead, try to argue that. You won't win.
"Only one candidate has suggested putting NASCAR drivers and college coaches in critical national security positions now held by lifelong military professionals who serve as generals and admirals."
Only one POTUS (in modern times and the only one I remember) has said he is going to make appointments based on race and not credentials (completely against the law). After less than a minute search, I found this...www.brookings.edu Brookings is more center than many outlets so it's not a stretch to say their data is somewhat balanced. And it provides a great response to someone who wants to demonize one POTUS for their appointments.
So, in summary, if the statements can be refuted easily, using them to support your hypocritical narrative only makes you look bad.
Drudge Retort Headlines
Mossad Weaponizes Hezbollah Pagers and Cellphones (138 comments)
Harris Soars to Record 6-point Lead (81 comments)
Alleged Trump Plotter Decried Hurdles by Ukrainian Government (56 comments)
Sean 'Diddy' Combs Arrested in New York City (25 comments)
US Secret Service says it is Aware of Musk Post about Biden, Harris (24 comments)
Migration to US Through Panama's Jungle Cut by 80 Percent (21 comments)
Tale of the Tape: National Review Editor Denies Using Slur (18 comments)
Yes, Trump Started the Fire. and Everyone Knows It. (16 comments)