Michael S. Schmidt - With Election Day looming, John F. Kelly, the former Marine general who was his longest-serving chief of staff - deeply bothered by Mr. Trump's recent comments about employing the military against his domestic opponents - agreed to three on-the-record, recorded discussions ... "[I]t's a very dangerous thing to have the wrong person elected to high office."
Yes, Trump's four years in office were just a horror - RIGHT???
#11 | Posted by MSgt
Trump was prevented by people like Kelly and others inside his adminstration from becoming the dictator he wanted to be. If there is another Trump adminstration, those guardrails will no longer be in place, either within the adminstration or outside of it. The Supreme Court's rulling in the Trump immunity case made sure of that.
Dirk Schwenk:threadreaderapp.com
In light of the new reporting that Tr u mp is a Hxtler supporter and outright fascist, I want to revisit Justice Roberts decision in Trump v. United States. A THREAD.
We all grew up in a country where it was flatly illegal for a POTUS to turn the military against the citizenry. There was never any question about that. It was a sure thing. That country is gone.
It has been repeatedly confirmed that Trump asked "his" generals to shoot protesters. And that they refused. THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN. Trump wants generals that are loyal, and if we put him in power, that is what he (and we) will get.
What changed? Roberts held that POTUS Article II powers cannot be limited or reviewed by any other branch of government. What are Art II powers? Commanding the Armed Forces and granting pardons are the Big 2.
Also included - APPOINTING SCOTUS JUSTICES and foreign policy.
SCOTUS has also found, and Roberts just vastly expanded, that firing people in executive agencies is a core Art. II function.
So Art. II gives POTUS the power to wield military force; pardon anyone; appoint SCOTUS justices, and fire anyone else. POTUS can institute a loyalty test and give military orders. DID CJ ROBERTS FIND ANY LIMITS TO THESE POWERS? No. It's unrestrained by courts or Congress.
So POTUS can order, without any review or restraint, military action against US citizens on US soil. And he can fire anyone that refuses. And he can pardon anyone that follows the order. And neither SCOTUS or Congress has any power to review or limit such actions.
SO LISTEN HERE EVERY LIVING SOUL. A vote for Trump is a vote for a person who wants to be a dictator. And if he wins, HE IS A DICTATOR ON DAY ONE. And there are no legal ways to stop him. None. Zero. THIS IS NOT A DRILL.
Dirk out.
It is true that Congress can deny funding for the military. And if you think that will pose a barrier, well ha ha the jokes on you. Anyone opposing will be in the camps.
If these claims are not true, I hope someone like Et_Al will weigh in with the appropriate correction(s).
Trump was prevented by people like Kelly and others inside his adminstration from becoming the dictator he wanted to be.
Are we talking about this Kelly?
John Kelly Confirms He Was Lying All Along: The White House Is in Chaos
www.rollingstone.com
Now he claims what? And everyone believes him?
LOL Lumpers are so comical.
Or are we talking about this John Kelly?
John Kelly refuses to apologize for false attacks on Florida congresswoman
www.washingtonpost.com
Drudge Retort Headlines
Biden Last Minute Pardons for His Family (110 comments)
Trump Commutes Sentences of Proud Boys, Oath Keepers Heads (47 comments)
Meet the Violent Jan. 6 Criminals Trump Let Back on the Streets (28 comments)
Trump Pardons Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht (27 comments)
Florida Declares State of Emergency Ahead of Winter Storm (27 comments)
Right-Wing Extremists Abuzz Over Musk's Straight-Arm Gesture (23 comments)
Bishop at Inaugural Prayer Service Pleads for Trump to 'have mercy' (22 comments)
'I Just Can't Agree': Trump's Jan. 6 Pardons Face Pushback from Some Republican Senators (20 comments)
Trump Orders US Withdrawal from WHO (19 comments)
Trump Launches Attack on 14th Amendment (17 comments)