Advocates say the changes will disproportionately impact the most vulnerable Americans.
Just like dismantling, the Department of Education will hurt rural schools the most, these Social Security requirements will hurt rural seniors the most. Why are they doing this? To empty out rural spaces and replace small towns with corporate farms and allow them pollute with impunity.
-- Jess Piper (@piperformissouri.bsky.social) March 24, 2025 at 9:00 AM
[image or embed]
"These are the very changes Visitor_ assured us weren't Trump's doing and have been in the works for years."
This story keeps getting worse and worse. It turns out that the SSA is rolling out changes to the phone service in just two weeks rather than in two years as would normally be the protocol, and all because DonOLD Trump is pushing them to do so:
Social Security rushing service cuts at White House request, sources saywww.axios.com
The Social Security Administration is rushing cuts to phone services at the White House's request, the agency's acting commissioner told Social Security advocates in a meeting on Monday, two sources who attended tell Axios.
Why it matters: These changes will strain the already struggling Social Security system and could even deprive some people of benefits entirely, according to current and former employees and advocates for retirees. . . .
Driving the news: Acting commissioner Leland Dudek said the changes in question would usually take two years to implement, but will be made in two weeks instead, the two sources said, on condition of anonymity due to fears of retaliation.
Dudek also said the changes, happening so fast and with little public understanding, will create opportunities for scammers, one of the sources said.
Dudek acknowledged the policy could increase fraud risks for beneficiaries, according to one attendee. He said in the past Social Security had been too "thoughtful" in considering beneficiaries before making changes.
Too "thoughtful" in considering beneficiaries in the past?!? You have to ask yourself: Why the rush? And the answer seems to be, by their own admission, that they want to prevent people from receiivng benefits:
These changes will strain the already struggling Social Security system and could even deprive some people of benefits entirely, according to current and former employees and advocates for retirees. . . .
Some beneficiaries could effectively be blocked from receiving benefits, per an internal Social Security memo, viewed last week by Axios.
Drudge Retort Headlines
First American Pope (123 comments)
Missouri GOP Lawmakers Seek to Make Gold, Silver Legal Tender (65 comments)
Poll: Views in the 5 Years Since George Floyd's Killing (47 comments)
Bill Gates says Elon Musk Is 'Killing World's Poorest Children' (36 comments)
Trump Administration Increases Spying on Greenland (29 comments)
GOP to Pay for Trump Tax Cuts with Sales of Public Land (28 comments)
US-UK: What Trade Deal? (27 comments)
Kash Patel Shows Up at Budget Hearing Without a Budget (20 comments)
Fed Holds Interest Rates Steady (20 comments)
House Passes GOP-led Bill to Rename Gulf of Mexico (18 comments)