Friday, May 02, 2025

Men will NOT compete in women's sports

President Donald Trump stirred the hearts of the University of Alabama graduates when he reaffirmed his promise to "keep men out of women's sports." During a commencement speech at the university's graduation ceremony on Thursday night, Trump gave a shoutout to the school's SEC champion women's track and field team before igniting a raucous applause by "vowing to defend women's sports." "As long as I'm president, we will always protect women's sports. Men will not play in women's sports," Trump said before the crowd erupted in cheers for its loudest and longest applause of the night.

Comments

Cue all the liberals in support of men in women's sports in 3....2...1

#1 | Posted by boaz at 2025-05-02 08:35 AM

Who gives a ----? No one sane. The trans thing is a wedge issue for republicans who do not care about women or women's sports at all.

#2 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-05-02 08:42 AM

Who gives a ----? No one sane. The trans thing is a wedge issue for republicans who do not care about women or women's sports at all.

#2 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-05-02 08:42 AM | Reply

They don't care about women sports. They never did.

#3 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-02 08:46 AM

Ticket sales prove that.

#4 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-05-02 08:47 AM

Since MAGAs obviously don't care about the constituation they used to bleat about whenever guns' rights were seemingly threatened,
they now care about women and women's sports,
and they totally have researched studies into transgenderism to understand what it is and so they care about transgenderism, too
/s

#5 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-05-02 08:49 AM

Hell they don't care about women period. Full stop. It's a wedge issue to keep evangelicals voting their way. That's it to a T.

#6 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-02 08:50 AM

Trump cares about women's sports if he can hang around in the locker room and watch them undress.

#7 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-05-02 08:51 AM

#7: e3.365dm.com

#8 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-05-02 10:36 AM

We are talking about roughly 50 people in ALL of College sports.

Glad you are addressing the important needs of the country.

#9 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-05-02 10:57 AM


Who gives a ----? No one sane. The trans thing is a wedge issue for republicans who do not care about women or women's sports at all.
#2 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

You don't have children, you don't have a daughter like I do.
She's not great at sports but I would hate for her to have to compete against "men" where there is a physical advantage for "men".
Every father of a daughter should feel this way, so no its not a wedge issue, in fact it will affect us more than any other federal policy.
www.thepinknews.com

I live in CA though I can only hope they ban trans women playing against my little girl playing badminton, but you never know.

This is where we are fighting to make it a felony to buy a 16- or 17-year-old for sex against the LGBTQA+ caucus..
spectrumnews1.com

I am sure the Republicans never cared about 16 and 17 yo either.

#10 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-05-02 11:01 AM

Trump does something about an imagninary problem while he promotes the guy who added a journalist to a war plans discussion that was taking place on an unauthorized, unsecure chat app.
Boaz, remember when you used to act like you cared about national security and the military. I didn't believe you actually cared then just like i don't actually believe you care about women's sports now.

#11 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-02 11:02 AM

You have never addressed me "Johnny Hotsauce" in the many years I've been on this forum.

It's about what's right and common sense.

#12 | Posted by boaz at 2025-05-02 11:55 AM

And to answer your partial question, I do care about national security, which is why I said whoever put that meeting together should be fired and prosecuted.

#13 | Posted by boaz at 2025-05-02 11:57 AM

If you care about national security then how do you feel about Donald Trump giving a promotion to the person who added the journalist to the chat?
Come to think of it, how do you feel about SecDef sending that info to family members?
Should Hegseth be fired and prosecuted?

#14 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-02 12:23 PM

You have never addressed me "Johnny Hotsauce" in the many years I've been on this forum.
It's about what's right and common sense.
#12 | Posted by boaz

I do care about national security, which is why I said whoever put that meeting together should be fired and prosecuted.
#13 | Posted by boaz

You didn't say whoever put the meeting together should be fired. You said the person who leaked the info should be fired. Hegseth is the person who wrongly claimed the chat was secure and then leaked the info to a journalist and then to family members in a second chat so I'll ask you again, should he be fired and prosecuted? He's also the one that had an unsecured internet connection installed in his office so he could hold such conversations.

Here's your comment followed by a response that I addressed to you.

That being said, whoever leaked that info in that chat should be prosecuted.
#44 | Posted by boaz
I'm old enough to remember when Boaz said he would no longer super Trump if he jeopardized national security. He specifically said something about if he messed with the joint chiefs.
Since that time we've seen Trump store classified documents in publicly accessible areas is his resort, ignore a federal subponea ordering their return, he fired the Chairman of the joint chiefs for being a black guy and he appointed a drunk fratboy to head the department of of defense who in about a month on the job has been caught sharing classified war plans on a public chat app with a journalist. And let's not forget that he staged a violent insurrection for the purpose of attempting to overthrow the Constitution.
Boaz, when you made that comment back in the day did you honestly believe it or did you already know you were so deep into the cult that you would never remove your lips from his ass even if he destroyed everything you ever claimed to believe in?

Posted by johnny_hotsauce

#15 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-02 12:34 PM

I stand by what I said. In both comments.

What's your problem?

#16 | Posted by boaz at 2025-05-02 12:41 PM

And stay on topic please.

#17 | Posted by boaz at 2025-05-02 12:42 PM

I stand by what I said. In both comments.
#16 | Posted by boaz

So you agree that Hegseth and Waltz should both be fired and prosecuted? You oppose Waltz appointment to UN Ambassador? How do you feel about Rubio, who was also involved in that unsecure chat that leaked details about an active military operation to the media being named National Security Advisor?

You say you were a soldier? How would have have felt if you knew senior leadership provided specifics to family and media about when and where you and others would be entering into a combat zone?

And stay on topic please.
#17 | Posted by boaz

No. I'm not interested in your fake rage bait topic.

#18 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-02 01:20 PM

Boaz, the only topic here is your obsession.

Most people don't care about women's sports at all, regardless of who's playing. Women's soccer and basketball are going to get popular any decade now, aren't they?

And many women's sports are known to be pretty lesbian-heavy. I'd think, just guessing, that like men, a lot of top-level athletes feel pretty entitled to grab what they want.

Any problem with lesbians in the lockerroom, Boaz? Or does that make you feel not as icky somehow?

#19 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-05-02 01:25 PM

Hum, as I am sure that many of those actual women in competition are most likely applaudingTrump...as they realize the dems were against them., Dems - their own worst enemy.

#20 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-05-02 03:09 PM

Considering men have never competed in women's sports, seems like virtue signaling.

#21 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-05-02 03:30 PM

DEI Bo-ass wouldn't qualify to compete in men's sports, so here we are.

#22 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-05-02 07:17 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

That $119 swimsuit -- With tariffs it will cost you $360 (48 comments)

Trump 'Two Dolls' Ruins Christmas (41 comments)

Trump Announces End to Harvard DHS Grants (38 comments)

US and Ukraine Sign Minerals Deal (38 comments)

Waltz First Cabinet Casualty (30 comments)

Change the Sites Name to Trump Retort (29 comments)

Trump Announces Plan to Rename Veterans Day (23 comments)

Trump EO Requires Truck Drivers to Speak English (23 comments)

These Judges Ruled Against Trump -- Then Their Families Came Under Attack (21 comments)

New Oklahoma Curriculum Includes pro-Trump Conspiracy Theories (21 comments)