Trump's VA Cut a Program that's Saving Vets' Homes

Monday, June 23, 2025

Jon Henry served in Iraq during the first Gulf War, in a unit meant to counter chemical warfare attacks. Luckily for him the attacks never happened, but he still earned full veterans benefits, including a home loan backed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Posted by reinheitsgebot at 08:31 PM | 14 COMMENTS | permalink

NPR has heard from more than 50 veterans around the country who are upset about the VA cutting a program that was helping vets avoid foreclosure. Veterans now have worse options than most Americans.

[image or embed]
-- NPR (@npr.org) Jun 19, 2025 at 4:32 PM

Comments

Why does the mush-brained orange pedo hate the troops?

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-22 11:24 AM

Raging on Facebook, that'll show em.

#2 | Posted by mattm at 2025-06-22 05:37 PM

The disgusting orange pedo once again tells the suckers and losers to eff off.

#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-23 11:11 PM

I'd be more surprised if he didn't do this.

Hey buddy...this is what you voted for. You just didn't think he would do it to you.

The thing is these ------------ screw over EVERYONE that is not in the 1%...poor communities with lead in their water, veterans, contractors, business owners, etc. Unless you have millions to fund their super pac or buy a $500,000 a plate dinner...---- off.

Enjoy your magat freedom.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-06-24 07:31 AM

---- Veterans I hope they all become homeless and die.

And quickly too. No long, drawn-out deaths wasting rich people's money!

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-24 07:43 AM

careful, snoofy. you're gonna confuse gacy.

#6 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-06-24 07:44 AM

Wait, so a POTUS is doing some good things and some bad things? Well golly gee shucks in a bottle, that never happens except FOR EVERY POTUS THAT HAS EVERY BEEN ELECTED.

"screw over EVERYONE that is not in the 1%."

While it's already been proven that Dem leaders have herded their sheep to believe things that aren't true, the fact you ignore all of the wealthy Dems who cater to the 1% is astonishing. To be at that level of controlled, you have to willingly let your masters enslave your mind. The "Reps are for the rich" narrative got played out as soon as Dems started protected their monetary interests more than Reps. But, sure, keep ignoring that and allowing yourself to be played by a party. Both parties are full of rich people who are pulling the strings, and people like you just let them do it because all you care about is pointing fingers and ignoring ALL of the evidence that proves you are misguided. The whole "fight the power" mantra has been changed by Dems to "fight the power but only the power that doesn't agree with our narrative; otherwise, let the power continue to abuse the masses".

#7 | Posted by humtake at 2025-06-24 12:40 PM

Wait, so a POTUS is doing some good things and some bad things?

Is this your best attempt at damage control?

You must also be of the opinion some Nazis are fine people.

#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-24 12:43 PM

"Wait, so a POTUS is doing some good things and some bad things?"

Well don't leave us hanging! Which kinds of things are these cuts to veterans services?

We need more homeless Veterans, and less handouts to Veterans.

These are Good Cuts to Bad Veterans.

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-24 12:44 PM

Little known fact

Humtake is physically unable to post without deflecting, referring or blaming dems or liberals

#10 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-06-24 12:50 PM

"The "Reps are for the rich" narrative got played out as soon as Dems started protected their monetary interests more than Reps."

Anyone know which monetary interests he's referring to?

I'm guessing Obamacare, which protected monetary interests... by extending health insurance to tens of millions of Americans.

What a perversion of democracy that a Capitalist country would seek to protect its monetary interests in a way that helps the poor, right Republicans?

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-24 12:52 PM

2 questions:

who won the 2020 election?

Which party is currently attempting to raise taxes on the working class and cut taxes on the rich?

#12 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-06-24 12:56 PM

Not gonna lie, I'm not sure it's a bad thing that program was terminated.

Becoming house poor shouldn't be incentivized, especially if the buyers are already getting good loans backed by taxpayer money.

#13 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-24 01:42 PM

Most overused five words spoken about current events today: "Even Republicans have questions"

Even Repiblicans will ask quiet questions among themselves and then go vote for legislation that harms Vets, Seniors, single mothers strggling to feed their kids , or worse, find healthcare services for those kids. Aspiring politicians who want to move up to the next level accept that the Party's agenda requires that they give up notions pf helping those groups and others and just focus on tax cuts for the billionaires.

#14 | Posted by danni at 2025-06-25 06:46 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Military Preparing for National Guard Activation in Washington D.C. (124 comments)

Half of GOP Would Still Vote for Trump If Implicated in Epstein Crimes (63 comments)