Monday, November 10, 2025

In SNAP Appeal, Trump Admin says it Faces More Harm than Those Without Food

James Sample: There is a paragraph on page 22 of the Trump administration's appeal of a federal judge's requirement that it make full November SNAP payments that has to be seen to be believed.

More

i will repeat: this is psychological torture for SNAP recipients.

[image or embed]

-- Marisa Kabas (@marisakabas.bsky.social) Nov 9, 2025 at 10:39 AM

Comments

In plain English, the Justice Department is telling the court that it would hurt the federal government more to comply with a judge's order requiring full food stamp payments than it would hurt millions of low-income Americans to potentially starve.

Let's simplify this further: the government is arguing that once the money is spent, it can't be unspent (and that would be horrible). But the hungry can't eat tomorrow (and that's not as bad). That is the contention.

#1 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:15 PM

In a 40-page filing to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, the administration insisted that being forced to spend money Congress has already appropriated is a graver injury than the hunger and disruption that would follow from withholding it. Friday night, the administration filed a nearly identical emergency stay request with the Supreme Court, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a temporary pause that will remain in effect until the circuit court issues a judgment on the matter.

#2 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:16 PM

Twice, a Rhode Island federal judge, John J. McConnell Jr., agreed, ordering the government to draw on existing accounts to cover the gap. Twice, the administration appealed, contending that the judiciary had usurped Congress's spending power by directing the executive branch to find the money.

#3 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:16 PM

And THIS is the exact same Trump that the BJ character seems to believe that Democrats should negotiate with, vis-a-vis healthcare.

An administration that says, in open court...

Let's simplify this further: the government is arguing that once the money is spent, it can't be unspent (and that would be horrible). But the hungry can't eat tomorrow (and that's not as bad). That is the contention.
And THIS is who this BJ character says Democrats should negotiate with.

PS... thanks, Lamplighter for the wonderful HTML lesson! :-)

#4 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:21 PM

Talk about "enemies of the people."
MAGAts revel in cruelty towards others.
It lets them try and flex their man -----.

#6 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-11-09 07:21 AM

Starting to see more and more people assuming they're fighting this so hard because the money is already gone.

Where to? Who knows.

I can't seem to figure out where the money is going so that programs are being illegally defunded but yet we're racking up debt at a record pace.

Where is the money going?

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2025-11-09 10:05 AM

Into Trump's pockets.

Duh?

Kleptocracy isn't just African --------- anymore.

Trump is systematically looting the country.

Every dollar he denies others is more for him to leverage.

Corruption, the old fashioned kind, is what's happening.

The SCOTUS will say it's all part of being President or some such Idiotic Excuse.

Our Entire system of Government has failed miserably.

#8 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-11-09 10:23 AM

The optics of this are horrendous, however, "irreparable harm" is a legally essential element of obtaining any form of injunction.

#9 | Posted by et_al at 2025-11-09 12:57 PM

Define "Irreparable" please.

Thanks.

#10 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-11-09 01:06 PM

Starting to see more and more people assuming they're fighting this so hard because the money is already gone.

Same

Where to? Who knows.

My guess, funneled out through DOGE.

I can't seem to figure out where the money is going so that programs are being illegally defunded but yet we're racking up debt at a record pace.

That's one benefit of firing everyone in the federal government that tracks these things.

Where is the money going?
#7 | POSTED BY JPW

My guess, off shore bank accounts.

#11 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-11-09 01:15 PM

Also.

It doesn't matter what Trump does.

Have you been reading form our merry band of Deplorable Trumping MAGAts? They continue blindly supporting anything Trump and the GOP do.

If enough people are unemployed hungry and miserable, Trump may get the civil unrest he desires so he can declare martial law.

#12 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-11-09 01:18 PM

@#4 ... PS... thanks, Lamplighter for the wonderful HTML lesson! :-) ...

Oh, geesh, what did I do this time?

#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-09 11:00 PM

The Cruelty Is The Point.
(And so is they lying.)

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-10 11:21 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Senate Reaches Deal to Fund Government (102 comments)

Cleaner Shot to Death After Going to Wrong House (36 comments)

Supreme Court Temporarily Allows Trump to Curtail Food Stamp Funding (26 comments)

Shutdown of U.S.A.I.D. Has Already Killed Hundreds of Thousands (22 comments)

Billionaire Threatens to Cut NYC Jobs and Move After Mamdani Win (22 comments)

Trump Wants New Commanders Stadium to Be Named After Him (16 comments)

Trump Admits He Doesn't Believe Grocery Prices Are Rising (16 comments)

As Trump says Americans will get a Tariff 'dividend,' Bessent Disagrees (15 comments)

US DoJ Probes Meatpackers, Attorney General Says (14 comments)

In SNAP Appeal, Trump Admin says it Faces More Harm than Those Without Food (13 comments)