Having said that to prosecute a president, former president or chief rival for president the burden of proof on the prosecution should be very high.

#3 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

It should be the same as any other case.

And her stupidity with this little tryst doesn't in anyway decrease that or change what Trump did or the validity of the evidence against him.

This is just normal, bottom of the barrel soap opera garbage that follows the Republicans around everywhere they go.

BTW drop the stupid "chief rival" crap. It's not a political prosecution no matter how much your "Trump hater" ass wants it to be.

If you think politics is playing zero role in the prosecution you are more of a hack than I realized.

#12 | Posted by BellRinger

Trump deserves every ounce of it. Politics is irrelevant given the enormity of evidence and publicly available information.

You're just angry that Trump is getting his comeuppance and need an excuse to latch on to to avoid realizing the true nature of your boy and how badly you were fooled.

Then put competent and uncompromisied people to prosecute him.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger

Sideshow --------. Gutter BS that's not surprisingly what the Trumper fools are focusing on as if it's relevant and/or exonerates Trump.

But, you will NEVER admit to any of that because you are a Dem and far-left foot-soldier - a partisan hack.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger

Says the most pro-Trump never Trumper ever.

Doesn't change the fact that this woman is compromising the case for all of the reasons stated in the linked article.

You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.

If it doesn't change the facts of the case, how is this compromising the case?

It literally changes nothing. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

God you're such a sad case.

FFS he says.

Now he knows what we all think when despite being one of the most dedicated spray tanned ball lickers on this site he tries to claim he doesn't like Trump.

Seriously, I cannot believe how much a partisan stooge you have become.

It's become reflexive.

#24 | Posted by BellRinger

You have your head so far up your own ass you've become an endless head-ass loop.

Explain to me how any of this changes the facts of the case.

Or how it taints it to the point of it being problematic.

Because it doesn't. You're just another Trumper moron hoping a deus ex machina will save your Dear Leader.

That doesn't excuse her transgressions.

Never said it does. Nowhere close.

So, according to JPW - EVERYTHING - everything is justifiable as long as it opposes Trump. ALL standards get chucked away, as long as it opposes Trump.

You are such a ------- unprincipled hack.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger

Where have I said anything remotely close to this?

There have been several threads on this, show me the posts where I said anything close to this.

Feel free to clarify.

#33 | Posted by BellRinger

Feel free to show me where I've excused this.

What's funny is you're simply projecting. You're inserting your own partisan BS where it doesn't exist anywhere other than your own mind.

Scroll up.

#40 | Posted by BellRinger

BS. C&P it. You don't get to assert what my thoughts are then demand I refute them.

Fani Willis is killing her own case with her own corruption. Ditch her. Now. If you have any sense of principle, find a better and uncompromised prosecutor. It's not difficult.

#41 | Posted by BellRinger

Two things.

The only way this helps your boy Trump is if there's an obvious conflict of interest involved. Her throwing her boy some meat isn't a conflict of interest that calls into question handling of the case.

Also, I don't have the power to "find a better and uncompromised prosecutor." You're so desperate to defend your boy you're making nonsensical demands.

Wow. Right now, I don't even know what else to say.

#44 | Posted by BellRinger

You clearly lack the bandwidth to argue this topic.

Just take the L and STFU.

Yet, here you clowns are, abusing our legal system and politicizing all of this to s new degree.....

Tactic shift noted. Goal post move measured.

Bullchit detected.

Try again, sport. You might concect on one of these hay makers.

and it might backfire short-term. Never mind the longer term precedent if the power structure shifts.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger

You can't claim the charges are legit then whine about supposed power shifts. All you're doing is threatening --- for tat nonsense.

Wipe the bronzer off your lips, ass kiss. It's not gonna get you anywhere.

Ah yes. Just bow down to your BS perception of being Vezzini.

#47 | Posted by BellRinger

That's an objective fact, dumbass.

Which is why you've yet to C&P that post where I do what you claim I've done.

I tell you what, I'm off to bed. We have movers coming tomorrow so I'm not likely to see any responses until evening, if at all. Gives you plenty of time to figure it out and post something coherent.