As if regulatory capture of agencies wasn't already a thing.

This decision is going to be a long term positive. Chevron was NEVER a good idea, and it was NEVER good lawmaking.

The executive branch should NOT be able to create crimes. And that's exactly what Chevron did - enabled executive branch agencies to create new criminal offenses that the courts decided were just as real as actual laws voted on by congress. Chevron was ultimately anti-democratic, and pro-regulatory capture.

These agencies have for decades been controlled by the businesses they regulate. There has been a revolving door between the C-levels and agency heads.

Loper Bright is at worst billionaire-neutral, and at best has the potential to hand power back to the people.

Given how badly a truly bad president can screw things up, shouldn't we ALL be interested in making the executive branch weaker?

Loper Bright doesn't give power to the courts. It gives it back to congress where the power to write laws should reside (at least until we can get direct democracy at the federal level).