Good article.

The Rahimi decision was predictable. Well, to me, at least.

The justices wrote (Thomas ironically, IIRC) in the Heller dicta that no right is absolute and that certain gun control regulations are and would remain constitutional. They then go through a brief listing of historical examples of guns being regulated or banned in where and whom could carry them.

They broadcast quite clearly that certain bedrock restrictions would remain in place. He'll, in Bruen they even said it didn't have to be a perfect analogue to be constitutional.

I think more cases will come up and will be ruled in a surprising fashion, especially challenges to the NFA and National Gun Control act.