Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, August 06, 2024

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas failed to disclose flights between Hawaii and New Zealand that he took on Republican megadonor Harlan Crow's private jet, Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden said Monday.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article...

... Why it matters: Thomas came under fire last year after several investigations revealed the close ties between him and Crow -- including that he'd failed to report luxury trips taken on Crow's dime -- that spurred greater scrutiny of Supreme Court justices' financial practices.

- - - Other reports showed that Crow had made private school tuition payments for Thomas' grandnephew, and that Thomas didn't properly disclose that he had sold property to Crow.

- - - Other justices, including Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito, have also faced questions about their disclosures. ...

While Thomas has officially disclosed some of the previously unreported trips, neither man has "disclosed the full scale" of Thomas' use of Crow's private jet and yacht, Wyden wrote in a letter to Crow's lawyer Monday.

- - - International flight records reveal that in 2010, Thomas and his wife, Ginni Thomas, took an undisclosed round trip from Hawaii to New Zealand aboard Crow's private jet, Wyden wrote.

- - - Wyden added that Crow has failed to address the "simple question" of whether he claimed tax deductions as a result of these trips, noting that passing off "trips involving personal hospitality as business expenses is a run of the mill tax scam."

- - - In June, the Senate Judiciary Committee said it had discovered additional undisclosed private jet flights that Thomas had taken aboard Crow's jet.

The big picture: "I am deeply concerned that Mr. Crow may have been showering a public official with extravagant gifts, then writing off those gifts to lower his tax bill," Wyden wrote. ...



#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-05 03:35 PM | Reply

There's on Office of the Inspector-General (OIG) in just about every federal organization in the US: HHS-OIG, DOD-IG, FDIC-OIG, CIA-OIG, DOS-OIG, DOJ-OIG, GSA-OIG, SSA-OIG etc etc rooting out fraud and corruption on behalf of the hard-working American taxpayer EXCEPT the SCOTUS.

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2024-08-05 03:48 PM | Reply

"Thomas and Alito Need to Go!!" - to the tune of:


www.youtube.com

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2024-08-05 03:53 PM | Reply

There was a time not long ago where the Court was looked at as being a respected institution. Justices expected each others behavior to be beyond reproach.
That is no longer the case and I blame John Roberts. In his 2011 end of the year report he wrote that the Court had "no reason to adopt the Code of Conduct as its definitive source of ethical guidance." That was the same year that it first came to the publics attention that Thomas had been violating disclosure rules ever since he joined the court by failing to report that his wife worked for the Heritage Foundation.
Roberts should have urged Thomas to resign back then but has instead allowed the corruption of the Court to grow to levels that were previously unimaginable under past Chief Justices.

#4 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2024-08-05 06:07 PM | Reply

What happens to this corrupt body of justices, maybe even Roberts, will depend on who wins the election in November.

If it's Trump, the corruption will go on unabated.

If it's Harris, a former prosecutor and Attorney General, she'll blow the lid of that Pandora's Box and, rather face impeachment and loss of pension benefits, we'll see some early retirements (conditional) from the U.S. Supreme Court.

#5 | Posted by Twinpac at 2024-08-06 08:57 PM | Reply

@#5 ... What happens to this corrupt body of justices, maybe even Roberts, will depend on who wins the election in November. ...

Yup.

COURT IN TRANSITION; 'I Believe That No One Is Above the Law Under Our System' (2005)
www.nytimes.com

... The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel issued a secret opinion in August 2002 which argued the president enjoys, quote, "complete authority over the conduct of war," close quote. And, quote, "The Congress lacks authority to set the terms and conditions under which the president may exercise his authority as commander in chief to control the conduct of operations during war," close quote. And then it took the argument to the extreme when it concluded the president, when acting as commander in chief was not bound -- was not bound -- by the federal law banning the use of torture.

In other words, the president would be above the law in that regard. You did not write that memo -- I hasten to add -- but you've seen it.

And I asked Attorney General Gonzales for his view of this memo, in particular this sweeping assertion of executive power, which puts the president above the law. He never gave an answer on that and that's one of the reasons why many had voted against his confirmation.

So, now let me ask you this: Do you believe that the president has a commander-in-chief override to authorize or excuse the use of torture in interrogation of enemy prisoners even though there may be domestic and international laws prohibiting the specific practice?

Judge Roberts -- Senator, I believe that no one is above the law under our system, and that includes the president. The president is fully bound by the law, the Constitution and statutes. ...

[emphasis mine]


#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-07 09:12 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort