Advertisement
DOGE Transitions to a Records System Not Subject to FOIA
Employees working for the agency now known as DOGE have been ordered to stop using Slack while government lawyers attempt to transition the agency to one that is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act, 404 Media has learned.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
Gal_Tuesday
Joined 2003/07/01Visited 2025/02/06
Status: user
MORE STORIES
US dairy cows infected with 2nd form of bird flu (4 comments) ...
Focus on the Coup (30 comments) ...
DOGE Transitions to a Records System Not Subject to FOIA (3 comments) ...
It's Not Amateur Hour Anymore (20 comments) ...
Trump will begin presidency in delicate position poll finds (8 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Still think this isn't a coup?:
The messages indicate that, under Elon Musk's leadership, DOGE is actively taking steps to make sure its communications and records are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act, a records transparency law commonly used by journalists and lawyers to hold government accountable. Instead, DOGE is asserting that rather than reporting up through the Office of Management and Budget as the United States Digital Service did for years, it is reporting through the Executive Office of the President and to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. Under OMB, it was generally subject to FOIA. Under the White House Chief of Staff, records it creates are generally not subject to FOIA. This would make DOGE a Presidential Records Act entity, meaning records it creates are not FOIAble until years after a president leaves office rather than a Federal Records Act entity, which would make its records FOIAble now. This is a very notable, but unsurprising move that federal records experts have been worried about since the issuance of Donald Trump's executive order renaming the United States Digital Service"an agency of federal tech workers that was formed under the Obama administration"to the United States DOGE Service. That executive order specifically states that the renamed entity "shall be established in the Executive Office of the President," and that the USDS administrator (Elon Musk) "shall report to the White House Chief of Staff."
This would make DOGE a Presidential Records Act entity, meaning records it creates are not FOIAble until years after a president leaves office rather than a Federal Records Act entity, which would make its records FOIAble now. This is a very notable, but unsurprising move that federal records experts have been worried about since the issuance of Donald Trump's executive order renaming the United States Digital Service"an agency of federal tech workers that was formed under the Obama administration"to the United States DOGE Service. That executive order specifically states that the renamed entity "shall be established in the Executive Office of the President," and that the USDS administrator (Elon Musk) "shall report to the White House Chief of Staff."
#1 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday at 2025-02-05 05:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
It's One Flew Over the Coup Coup Clock!!
"COUP TWO: The Traitor Trump Coup"..... is on time and running steady, using the exact Formula put forth in Project25, which Trump never heard of.
My secular opinion is that sooner or later he's going to have to call on the US Military to defend his sorry fat ass, and that he's going to be sorely disappointed when he does.
Just today he ordered them to ban any clubs that people in the Military enjoy that are cultural and educational clubs... it's a white man thing, they hate diversity... and that after taking General M's picture down at the Pentagon and elsewhere.
Don't think they liked being called, 'losers', either.
You don't want to hear my non-secular opinion.
#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-02-05 05:18 PM | Reply
That sounds illegal. I'm sure the newly-cleansed FBI will get right on that.
#3 | Posted by censored at 2025-02-05 06:07 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable