Judges appointed by Trump keep ruling against him.
When a Donald Trump-appointed judge delivered a stinging rejection of his effort to put National Guard troops on the ground in Portland, the president had some regrets. "I wasn't served well by the people that pick judges," Trump vented Saturday.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2025/10/07
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Judges appointed by Trump keep ruling against him. (7 comments) ...
Mysterious Aircraft Crash Near Area 51 Just Got Weirder (3 comments) ...
Mysterious Aircraft Crash Near Area 51 Just Got Weirder (0 comments) ...
Poll: Nearly 80% Want Congress to Extend ACA Tax Credits (10 comments) ...
Trump texts in answers to news interview ... (13 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... His gripe came four months after he similarly sounded off about the "bad advice" he got from the conservative Federalist Society for his first-term judicial nominations -- a reaction to a ruling, backed by a Trump-appointed judge, rejecting his power to impose sweeping tariffs on U.S. trading partners. "This is something that cannot be forgotten!" he said on Truth Social. ...
"This is something that cannot be forgotten!" he said on Truth Social. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 12:20 AM | Reply
... "I wasn't served well by the people that pick judges," Trump vented Saturday. ...
Wait. What?
What the friggin' what?
Pres Trump seems to want the Judges he appoints to server him instead of the Constitution?
Wow, just friggin' wow.
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 12:23 AM | Reply
Of course he does. It worked for SCOTUS... who are these low level minions to doubt?
#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-08 12:36 AM | Reply
@#3 ... It worked for SCOTUS ...
Yup.
And the Roberts SCOTUS is building a history.
What might that history be?
And how might it be viewed in a historical perspective?
imo Chief Justice Roberts has lost control of the Court he presides over.
But that is just my opinion.
#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 12:44 AM | Reply
Or he's fulfilling his mission.
#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-08 12:50 AM | Reply
@#5 ... Or he's fulfilling his mission. ...
Possibly.
I'm not convinced of that yet.
That aside, how might the Roberts Court go down in history?
#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 01:20 AM | Reply
Subservient to another "equal" branch of government?
#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-08 01:23 AM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy