Judges Appointed by Trump Keep Ruling Against Him.

Wednesday, October 08, 2025

When a Donald Trump-appointed judge delivered a stinging rejection of his effort to put National Guard troops on the ground in Portland, the president had some regrets. "I wasn't served well by the people that pick judges," Trump vented Saturday.

Posted by LampLighter at 10:33 PM | 10 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Who is Karin Immergut, the Trump-appointed federal judge who blocked national guard deployment in Portland?

[image or embed]
-- Alex Zielinski (@alexzee.bsky.social) Oct 8, 2025 at 12:31 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... His gripe came four months after he similarly sounded off about the "bad advice" he got from the conservative Federalist Society for his first-term judicial nominations -- a reaction to a ruling, backed by a Trump-appointed judge, rejecting his power to impose sweeping tariffs on U.S. trading partners.

"This is something that cannot be forgotten!" he said on Truth Social. ...

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 12:20 AM | Reply

... "I wasn't served well by the people that pick judges," Trump vented Saturday. ...

Wait. What?

What the friggin' what?

Pres Trump seems to want the Judges he appoints to server him instead of the Constitution?

Wow, just friggin' wow.

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 12:23 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Pres Trump seems to want the Judges he appoints to server him instead of the Constitution?

Of course he does. It worked for SCOTUS... who are these low level minions to doubt?

#3 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-08 12:36 AM | Reply

@#3 ... It worked for SCOTUS ...

Yup.

And the Roberts SCOTUS is building a history.

What might that history be?

And how might it be viewed in a historical perspective?

imo Chief Justice Roberts has lost control of the Court he presides over.

But that is just my opinion.

#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 12:44 AM | Reply

imo Chief Justice Roberts has lost control of the Court he presides over.

Or he's fulfilling his mission.

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-08 12:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

@#5 ... Or he's fulfilling his mission. ...

Possibly.

I'm not convinced of that yet.

That aside, how might the Roberts Court go down in history?

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-10-08 01:20 AM | Reply

That aside, how might the Roberts Court go down in history?

Subservient to another "equal" branch of government?

#7 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-10-08 01:23 AM | Reply

Subservient to another "equal" branch of government?

Too early to tell. So far the rulings have been about remedies, e.g. injunctions. I'll wait for the merits rulings.

#8 | Posted by et_al at 2025-10-08 03:45 AM | Reply

"I wasn't served well by the people that pick judges," Trump vented Saturday.

They're not US judges....they're HIS judges. To rule in his favor.

Just like the tinpot dictator he fancies himself.

That aside, how might the Roberts Court go down in history?

He has done the single biggest amount of damage to the rule of law and the Constitution in the history of the United States of any SCOTUS justice.

His court has ruled....

It's okay to accept bribes.
It's okay for unlimited amounts of anonymous money can be used to buy elections.
The President is unaccountable for any crimes committed when in office (Richard Nixon is rolling in his grave).
Colleges cannot racially profile but ICE can.
Six justices decided it was cool that they perjured themselves under oath.
Unkie Thomas has been for sale to the highest bidder for decades along with well himself and Alito and Keggenaugh.

The single most corrupt court is his legacy.

#9 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-10-09 07:12 AM | Reply

Trump is trying to create the need to use the Insurrection Act. He needs this done before November 4 when the elections happen. He knows he'll lose the majority of Congress if he doesn't. Most likely his idea will be for his people to count the ballots, with a thumb on the scale, of course.

Both the history of voting which usually goes against the party in power as well as the majority of the polls indicate he won't have the majority after the election, meaning that he'll have far more trouble doing whatever he wants to do unchecked.

Hence the reason he is preparing the public with the announcement he's considering the Insurrection Act. Facts haven't mattered so much with Trump. He has no troubles with lying and it seems the party supporting him has no troubles with it either.

#10 | Posted by BBQ at 2025-10-09 06:41 PM | Reply