Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, November 13, 2025

The White House summoned a key Republican lawmaker to the Situation Room on Wednesday for a meeting over the effort to release files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Officials met in the Situation Room with Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado, one of the Republicans who has signed on to an effort to force a vote on releasing all of the Epstein files. That effort is moving forward after a newly elected Democrat was seated in the House of Representatives and also signed on to the effort, providing the final signature needed, according to CNN.

The White House has been pressuring lawmakers against further Epstein disclosures over concerns the files could prove problematic for President Donald Trump. ...



#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 01:26 PM | Reply

Soooo... if the Epstein Files are, as Pres Trump has been characterizing them, a Democratic hoax, then why go to such an extreme attempt (e.g., inviting a lawmaker into the Situation Room) to prevent their release?

What is the Trump admin trying to cover-up?

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 01:28 PM | Reply

Lauren Boebert is a "key lawmaker?" K.

#3 | Posted by qcp at 2025-11-13 01:34 PM | Reply

@#3 ... Lauren Boebert is a "key lawmaker?" K. ...

You noticed that also? :)

I suspect they may mean "key" in that she is MAGA and a Rep that might be persuaded to change a vote on the Epstein files.

Not "key" in the overall House type of thing, just key in the 218 Epstein File votes.


#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 01:40 PM | Reply

she is MAGA and a Rep that might be persuaded to change a vote on the Epstein files.

Exactly. They might even make up a new Cabinet position for her.

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-11-13 01:53 PM | Reply

she is MAGA and a Rep that might be persuaded to change a vote on the Epstein files.

They already voted, she didn't change her vote.

#6 | Posted by qcp at 2025-11-13 02:09 PM | Reply

COMMENTARY: It appears Rep. Lauren Boebert did a brave thing today and deserves all our thanks. #copolitics pic.twitter.com/z61QjGJu2G" Kyle Clark (@KyleClark) November 13, 2025

#7 | Posted by qcp at 2025-11-13 02:13 PM | Reply

That bitch is Retarded.

No matter How She Votes.

Trump is trying to Save his Ass.

He won't, in the End even his Own will Turn on him.

#8 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-11-13 02:15 PM | Reply

@#6 ... They already voted, she didn't change her vote. ...

Next step is the vote next week in the House, then off to the Senate ...

#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 02:38 PM | Reply

An unanswered question ...

@#2

... Soooo... if the Epstein Files are, as Pres Trump has been characterizing them, a Democratic hoax, then why go to such an extreme attempt (e.g., inviting a lawmaker into the Situation Room) to prevent their release?

What is the Trump admin trying to cover-up? ...



Anyone?

#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 09:43 PM | Reply

why go to such an extreme attempt (e.g., inviting a lawmaker into the Situation Room) to prevent their release?

Lewzer was given a LOT of money by a LOT of rich, powerful people to keep those files buried.

#11 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-11-13 09:50 PM | Reply

Update: House Speaker Mike Johnson decided to quickly schedule a House vote on an effort to force the release of all of the Jeffrey Epstein case files once the calculation was made that it couldn't be stopped.

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-11-13 10:08 PM | Reply

More ...

MAGA lawmaker's shock comment after attending Situation Room crisis meeting on Epstein
www.yahoo.com

... A loyal MAGA follower of President Donald Trump is raising eyebrows with comments after she attended an emergency White House Situation Room meeting on the Jeffrey Epstein files.

In an unusual move, top administration officials met with GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado in the White House Situation Room on Wednesday to discuss a House vote on the release of documents related to child sex offender Epstein, the Independent reported.

"I guess I'm pretty high profile," Boebert said.

ABC News reported that White House and Justice Department officials pressed Boebert to take her name off a House discharge position which looks to force a vote on releasing files related to Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019.

The petition at the time had 217 signatures, one shy of the 218 total signatures needed for it to go into effect. Boebert is one of four Republicans who have signed on to the measure.

Following the Situation Room meeting, Boebert wrote on X, "I want to thank White House officials for meeting with me today. Together, we remain committed to ensuring transparency for the American people."

The lawmaker told CNN that Trump did not attempt to pressure her to remove her signature from the petition.

"Doesn't that show the level of transparency when we are willing to sit down with members of Congress and address their concerns?" White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters.

However, Leavitt added, "I'm not going to detail conversations that took place in the Situation Room."

When asked why the meeting was held in the ultra-secure Situation Room, Boebert said "it's just an easy [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility] to get to."

However, the Situation Room is historically the venue where high-level matters of national security are coordinated, such as the deadly 2003 attack on 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. ...


#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 10:08 PM | Reply


@#12 ... Update: House Speaker Mike Johnson decided to quickly schedule a House vote on an effort to force the release of all of the Jeffrey Epstein case files once the calculation was made that it couldn't be stopped. ...

At this point, my question is becoming, how many Reps in the House will vote to release?

Will the count be just enough? Or will it be an upside surprise to release the Epstein Files?

Time will tell.

#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 10:32 PM | Reply

'No one has threatened me': MAGA firebrand and rape survivor Nancy Mace holds firm that Epstein files must be released
www.independent.co.uk

... Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) pushed back on allegations that President Donald Trump had attempted to pressure her against signing a discharge petition in the House of Representatives to force a vote to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Mace spoke to The Independent exclusively as she headed to the House floor after a discharge petition proposed by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) reached the requisite 218 signatures Wednesday after Speaker Mike Johnson swore in Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.).

Mace said she had not spoken to Trump since Friday.

"I've been traveling, and I had a big press conference yesterday, so he and I've been on the road, but he and I've been playing phone tag," she said.

She is one of three Republican women who joined the discharge petition alongside Reps. Lauren Boebert of Colorado and Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Boebert was summoned to the White House Wednesday for what was reportedly a crisis meeting in the super-secure Situation Room to try and get her to remove her name from the petition. ...


#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 10:35 PM | Reply

Trump, allies reach out to Boebert, Mace ahead of Epstein discharge petition deadline
thehill.com

... Trump also called Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) on Wednesday morning, but she missed his call and had been playing phone tag with him as of early Wednesday afternoon, a source told The Hill, adding that there had not been outreach from White House staff. ...

#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 10:38 PM | Reply

@#16 ... she missed his call and had been playing phone tag with him ...

,,, or deciding not to converse?

#17 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-13 10:39 PM | Reply

Boebert, Mace - both were known to have signed the discharge petition were summoned to the SCIF Situation Room specifically over their vote on the Epstein release matter. That alone is immense pressure and a message sent. They could be extremely dumb, or they could be extremely determined. Perhaps both. But there's no way pressure wasn't applied to them, whether they recognized it or not.

#18 | Posted by YAV at 2025-11-13 10:50 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort