Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, December 22, 2025

"House Democrats are going to continue to fight to get this extension through the Congress on our side. It will pass with a bipartisan majority," Jeffries told host Jonathan Karl on ABC News's "This Week."

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Hakeem Jeffries says Obamacare subsidy extension 'will pass with a bipartisan majority'

[image or embed]

-- Politico (@politico.com) Dec 21, 2025 at 12:02 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"If it passes, that will put pressure on Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and his caucus to reverse course and back an extension, Jeffries noted. A three-year extension of the ACA subsidies " backed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) " failed in the upper chamber earlier this month because of opposition from the majority of the GOP."

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-21 10:14 PM | Reply

Mike Johnson is a fraud.

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-12-21 11:14 PM | Reply

House Rethugs are watching their Party lose elections all around the country... and thinking they should try to keep their jobs rather than kowtow to Trump some more.

Sen Rethugs may not be so worried.

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-21 11:23 PM | Reply

The Senate is insulated from public opinion more than the House is.

For just this kind of reasons.

That's why direct election of Senators didn't become law until 1913.

It's an inherently ANTI DEMOCRATIC Body.

The Oligarchy got special Privileges from the Founders. They got Super Representation,long before Citizens United.

Like Slavery, it was one of the greatest flaws in our system.

If Anything, the Senate should be less protected from the "Rabble" than the House.

Like One year terms, with term limits.

No more than 4 consecutive terms.

A 6 year term staggered among the members with no direct election was a way to give the Propertied Rich a Veto on the House.

It was INTENDED to be a brake on the House.

Why they felt this was Appropriate is not Clear to me.

Something about Fear of the Poor.

#4 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-12-22 09:59 AM | Reply

It will not pass the Senate.

#5 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-12-22 03:46 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort