Advertisement
Kari Lake Forced to Answer Questions About Voice of America Under Oath
A senior federal judge ordered Trump administration official Kari Lake to submit to questioning under oath in ongoing litigation over her efforts to effectively dismantle Voice of America despite Congressional mandates that it be maintained.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
retort
Joined 2003/04/04Visited 2003/04/04
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Engaged (18 comments) ...
Kari Lake Forced to Answer Questions About Voice of America Under Oath (5 comments) ...
Public Broadcast Cuts Hit Trump Areas Hard (1 comments) ...
Krugman: Trump Attempt to Fire Lisa Cook is Illegal (20 comments) ...
America is Becoming Morally and Ethically Bankrupt (22 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the cited article ...
... At a court hearing, U.S District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said Lake was "verging on contempt of court" for failing to comply with his repeated orders to make information available about her intentions for the future of the federally funded international broadcaster. He said Lake and two aides had to testify by Sept. 15 and provide the court with detailed information she had, to date, withheld about Voice of America and its federal parent, the U.S. Agency for Global Media. One of the aides is Frank Wuco, a political appointee who helped to investigate Voice of America journalists for perceived anti-Trump bias at the end of President Trump's first term. (A different federal judge later found that to be unconstitutional.) In a comment emailed to NPR, Lake rejected Judge Lamberth's power in the case to have the final say over her actions. "Time and again, we've seen district court judges overstep their authority," Lake told NPR. "It's wrong, but sadly, it's become the norm. The current case against USAGM is a great example of why we need to restore constitutional checks and balances." ...
He said Lake and two aides had to testify by Sept. 15 and provide the court with detailed information she had, to date, withheld about Voice of America and its federal parent, the U.S. Agency for Global Media. One of the aides is Frank Wuco, a political appointee who helped to investigate Voice of America journalists for perceived anti-Trump bias at the end of President Trump's first term. (A different federal judge later found that to be unconstitutional.)
In a comment emailed to NPR, Lake rejected Judge Lamberth's power in the case to have the final say over her actions.
"Time and again, we've seen district court judges overstep their authority," Lake told NPR. "It's wrong, but sadly, it's become the norm. The current case against USAGM is a great example of why we need to restore constitutional checks and balances." ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-26 03:27 PM | Reply
This is some good news.
New administrations aren't supposed to be able to come in and change or ignore years of president and congressional mandates just because the administration doesn't approve of the message.
That's not a presidential power, and belongs to Congress. Which, are a bunch of, how do I say in 2025... oh yeah, and bunch a panty wastes.
So, we have the courts, which is a mixed bag, unless we're talking about SCOTUS, which is predictable and in Trump's pocket.
BTW, I know most of the libs around here already understand what I am saying, but I thought it might help an rtard to get a clue.
#2 | Posted by horstngraben at 2025-08-26 03:28 PM | Reply
*ignore years of president *
This was meant to be a pun, and was definitely not a typo...
#3 | Posted by horstngraben at 2025-08-26 03:29 PM | Reply
"A senior federal judge ordered Trump administration official Kari Lake to submit to questioning under oath"
Gonna be a whole lot of lying under oath!
#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-26 04:46 PM | Reply
Can she use a ring light while testifying? Asking for a haggard old former TV personality eager to get rid of those pesky wrinkles, even in drawings from a courtroom sketch artist...
#5 | Posted by catdog at 2025-08-26 05:16 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy