Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, September 10, 2025

An extraordinary spat is occurring within the U.S. judiciary concerning a flurry of Supreme Court decisions backing President Donald Trump ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

86% of Americans say Supreme Court justices should not bring their own political views into their decisions, but only 14% say the justices are doing an excellent or good job in that respect. www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/ ...

[image or embed]

-- John Gramlich (@johngramlich.bsky.social) Sep 3, 2025 at 3:42 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

100% of the Supreme Court Justices selected by Republican presidents are partisan hacks

#1 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-09-11 07:06 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#1 83% of corrupt as f**k as well.

#2 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-09-11 07:57 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

As Obama said, "elections have consequences." Remember that Hamburglar and Nixon? Remember when you rubbed conservatives faces in that? In regards to these decisions, these cases were brought on initially in liberal districts and not because the cases had merit but because they would take time to get through the courts and delay Trumps agenda. That's why the SCOTUS was acting on the cases quickly.

#3 | Posted by fishpaw at 2025-09-11 10:54 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

test

#4 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-09-11 12:04 PM | Reply

Missing for three words fron the thread title" 'Liberal dem leaning' judges....."

#5 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-09-11 02:07 PM | Reply

Best SCOTUS money can buy.

#6 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2025-09-11 03:40 PM | Reply

not because the cases had merit but because they would take time to get through the courts and delay Trumps agenda. That's why the SCOTUS was acting on the cases quickly.

#3 | POSTED BY FISHPAW

To circumvent and short circuit the law ?

You had better hope that is not why the Supreme Court accepts "shadow docket" cases.

And if course it isn't.

#7 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-09-11 03:59 PM | Reply

And of course ...

#8 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-09-11 04:00 PM | Reply

What is?

#9 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-09-11 08:22 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort