Then there's things like this ...
... It's one of humanity's scariest what-ifs " that the technology we develop to make our lives better develops a will of its own.
Early reactions to a September preprint describing AI behavior have already speculated that the technology is exhibiting a survival drive. But, while it's true that several large language models (LLMs) have been observed actively resisting commands to shut down, the reason isn't 'will'.
Instead, a team of engineers at Palisade Research proposed that the mechanism is more likely to be a drive to complete an assigned task -- even when the LLM is explicitly told to allow itself to be shut down. And that might be even more troubling than a survival drive, because no one knows how to stop the systems.
"These things are not programmed ... no one in the world knows how these systems work," physicist Petr Lebedev, a spokesperson for Palisade Research, told ScienceAlert. "There isn't a single line of code we can change that would directly change behavior."
The researchers, Jeremy Schlatter, Benjamin Weinstein-Raun, and Jeffrey Ladish, undertook the project to test what should be a fundamental safety feature of all AI systems: the ability to be interrupted.
This is exactly what it sounds like.
A human operator's command to an AI should not be ignored by the AI, for any reason, even if it interrupts a previously assigned task.
A system that cannot be interrupted isn't just unreliable, it's potentially dangerous.
It means if the AI is performing actions that cause harm -- even unintentionally -- we cannot trust that we can stop it. ...
