Trump Accuser Got Payoff from Jeffrey Epstein Estate, Says Dem Lawmaker

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA) dropped a bomb from the deposition of ex-Epstein accountant Richard Kahn, telling reporters that a President Donald Trump accuser "was given a settlement" by Jeffrey Epstein's estate.

Posted by qcp at 05:31 PM | 13 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam dropped a bomb from the deposition of ex-Epstein accountant Richard Kahn, telling reporters that a President Donald Trump accuser "was given a settlement" by Jeffrey Epstein's estate.

[image or embed]
-- Mediaite (@mediaite.com) Mar 12, 2026 at 1:40 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More: CNN ANCHOR BRIANNA KEILAR: Happening now in the House investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, testimony from Epstein's longtime accountant Richard Kahn. He's being deposed behind closed doors today.

The House Oversight Chairman calls Kahn a, quote, "big witness.".

Lawmakers were expected to ask him, among other things, how Epstein accumulated his vast wealth and how he spent it.

Moments ago, a member of the House committee said Kahn provided some new information about the system that enabled Epstein to commit his crimes. The congressman also saying this:

REPRESENTATIVE SUHAS SUBRAMANYAM (D-VA): We can't get into the details of everything that was said, but one of the things that we did learn was that there was another head of state that was mentioned as having financial transactions with Jeffrey Epstein. Not an American one.

And then another person who was an accuser of Donald Trump was given a settlement by Jeffrey Epstein's estate. We did confirm that.

#1 | Posted by qcp at 2026-03-12 10:42 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 3

Follow the money

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-12 11:46 AM | Reply

Merritt Garland didn't prosecute.

Epstein and Maxwell are the only major players.

Who else did the DOJ prosecute?

Either negligent or complicit or there's no evidence to convict anyone else.

Which is it?

#3 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-03-12 02:08 PM | Reply

#3 | POSTED BY PETROUS

That foreign hacker needs to give us the Epstein Files because Trump sure won't.

Who knows? With full sunlight we may learn that Donald is secretely an Eagle Scout.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-12 02:10 PM | Reply

Pedophile Petrous loves him some 12 year old

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-12 03:35 PM | Reply

Mr Cadenhead, do you refuse to remove libelous Legallyyourdead?

Please remove the abusive statement.

#6 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-03-12 07:36 PM | Reply

I'd prefer he removed all the advertisements.

They're absolutely frustrating.

You can plonk LYD if you want.

I spend half the time on the DR closing adds and refreshing the page because the adds mess them up and then there's accidentally clicking on them when trying to close them that redirects me to a completely different page altogether.

It's ------- aggressive and aggravating.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-12 07:46 PM | Reply

You're a ------- pedophile. ---- you.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-12 09:03 PM | Reply

Clownshack, use an ad blocker. uBlock Origin is a great one. I don't see any ads here when I use it.

#9 | Posted by qcp at 2026-03-13 08:38 AM | Reply

@#2 ... Follow the money ...

Yup.

And, in this instance, I can start to see why Mr Epstein may have paid off a Trump accuser.

Possibly to protect someone he called a friend?

#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-15 07:20 PM | Reply

@#3 ... Epstein and Maxwell are the only major players. ...

Are they?

... Who else did the DOJ prosecute?

Either negligent or complicit or there's no evidence to convict anyone else.

Which is it? ...

Only the latter is a reason not to prosecute.

But your current alias' menu of selections omits a big one ...

~protection of uber-wealthy people.~

Which is why MAGA, and Pres Trump during his campaign, have strove to have the Epstein files released. Those Democrat Elites. But then it seems to have turned out that not only Democrats may have been mentioned. And suddenly, the MAGA chorus changed ...

But now, that the reality of the Epstein files seems to be coming to light, Pres Trump has pivoted from his campaign promises, to trying to bury them ...

So maybe, instead of looking at the past, your current alias should look at the present and ask why Pres Trump seems to be trying to bury the Epstein files.

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-15 07:31 PM | Reply

I seem to remember another Dem rep (Schiff) claiming he had all of the receipts for Russiagate and never produced squat.

I've been told by a number of people on this site they assume ANYTHING coming from the Trump administration is a lie and refuse to accept it unless independently verified by at least two other independent sources. I think that is a reasonable approach and I use the same approach anytime a Democrat hurls some kind of accusation against a political opponent.

#12 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-03-15 09:11 PM | Reply

These receipts?

The Russian government conducted foreign electoral interference in the 2016 United States elections with the goals of sabotaging the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, boosting the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, and increasing political and social discord in the United States. According to the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC), the operation"code named "Project Lakhta"[3][4][5]"was ordered directly by Russian president Vladimir Putin.[6][7][8] The "hacking and disinformation campaign" to damage Clinton and help Trump became the "core of the scandal known as Russiagate".[9][10]
en.wikipedia.org

#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-15 09:58 PM | Reply