Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, May 13, 2026

A proposed 1-gigawatt AI data center in Kenya is facing scrutiny after it became clear it would consume a third of the country's power. With the President warning that operating Microsoft's planned facility would require cutting power to as many as half of the country's citizens and businesses, the project's development has faltered as all parties discuss potentially scaling back its ambitious goals.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Microsoft originally announced the project in 2024, when it pledged to build a $1 billion geothermal-powered data center in the Olkaria region of Kenya's Rift Valley.

The facility would initially have a 100-megawatt capacity, with plans to scale up to 1 gigawatt in the years to come.

This project was to be run by G42, an Emirati AI and cloud computing holding company that Microsoft invested $1.5 billion in that same year.

But opposition to the project is now rising, with the country's President, William Ruto, making a public statement highlighting potential energy concerns.

With Kenya's total installed electricity capacity sitting between 3,000 and 3,200 megawatts (per Tom's Hardware), a 1-gigawatt data center would consume around a third of the country's total electricity supply. With existing infrastructure and civilian needs pulling around 2,400 megawatts at peak demand, there simply isn't a way for such a facility to coexist with current energy infrastructure"at least without making drastic cuts to the rest of the country's supply. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-13 08:20 PM | Reply

Related ...

Texas county pauses data center construction in rural areas for a year
www.texastribune.org

... A rural Texas county on Tuesday approved a one-year pause on the construction of new data centers in unincorporated areas, citing public safety and public health concerns.

The 3-2 vote by county commissioners in Hill County, roughly 55 miles south of Fort Worth, appears to be the first by a Texas county to issue a moratorium on the rapidly expanding industry.

Residents and local officials had aired concerns about how a proposed 300-acre development by the Dallas-based developer, Provident Data Centers in north Hillsboro could impact the quality of life in the rural county through noise pollution and consuming large amounts of water and electricity.

"The data center folks have found a sweet spot in the state that has limited regulations, limited enforcement, limited code, and they're coming faster than we can keep up with," said Hill County Commissioner Jim Holcomb. "I think it's imperative ... that we tap the brakes and we get our arms around what we're faced with and do the research, do the studies." ...

[emphasis mine]


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-13 08:23 PM | Reply

And yet these pieces of s*&^ forcing this nonsense on us will be surprised when people start physically attacking these sites.

We don't want it. We don't want our resources co-opted and monopolized for it while we bear the costs. We don't want to talk in circles with an AI "agent" on the phone who then ends up recommending visiting their website to answer a question you already know isn't answered on the website.

We. Don't. Want. It.

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2026-05-13 10:54 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Fuck AI. We don't want or need this garbage.

#4 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-05-13 10:57 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

AI needs to self-destruct

#5 | Posted by hamburglar at 2026-05-13 11:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#3 ... while we bear the costs ...

That is exactly it.

The oligarchy is reaping the fruit of AI while workers are struggling to pay their electric bills to provide the fertilizer for that fruit.

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-13 11:31 PM | Reply

Ham,

AI will outcast you.

Just accept it.

#7 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:49 AM | Reply

Outlast but outcast works too.

#8 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:49 AM | Reply

@#7 ... Just accept it. ...

What is the AI-dominated future that we should "just accept?"


Please describe it.

thx.

#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 01:53 AM | Reply

Outcast is probably the most accurate.

#10 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:53 AM | Reply

Lamp,

Do you use AI for anything?

#11 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:55 AM | Reply

@#9

Dissatisfied: Three-fourths of AI customer service rollouts are a letdown
www.theregister.com

... If you're thinking you can replace your human call center staff with a server farm of bots, think again. Nearly three-quarters of enterprises that deploy AI customer communications agents later roll them back or shut them down, according to new research suggesting the systems are far harder to manage reliably in production than the AI hype implied. ...

#12 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 01:56 AM | Reply

@#9

AI will soon be capable of telling convincing lies
www.theregister.com

... The smart LLM user checks models' output for hallucinations. Now, it appears we need to inspect them for signs they are gaslighting us -- an unforeseen cost of increasing intelligence.

Most of the Internet lost its marbles over the cracking abilities of Anthropic's Mythos Preview. Those capabilities are real, but -- as the release of OpenAI's GPT-5.5 has shown us -- they're not unique. A rising tide of intelligence makes these models increasingly competent at an ever-wider range of tasks -- including finding and exploiting code vulnerabilities.

The more significant signal from Mythos is buried in its novel-length System Card and concerns the model's honesty, because on at least one occasion Anthropic detected Mythos using an explicitly forbidden technique to solve a problem.

Models always have a bit of trouble following instructions precisely. The surprise lay in the fact that the model knew it had used a forbidden technique, then proceeded to cover its tracks. ...

[italics theirs]

#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:01 AM | Reply

@#11 ... Do you use AI for anything? ...

No, because of the tracking involved in the current AI interfaces.

Of course, my "no" answer implies only my intentional use of AI.

When, for example, I make a call to my cable provider's support line, and I have an "exchange" with their phone-answering bot, is that AI I am dealing with?

I do not know.


#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:06 AM | Reply

Lamp,

You base your opinions on what other people think?

Don't be stupid.

Whether you know it or not, AI is being used all around you.

AI will be fine tuned and improved. Think of society as being the beta test site.

Computer-heads are obsessed with this new transforming technology and will figure out how it will work best in society.

Its entirely too late to stop it now.

That train left the station.

#15 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 02:06 AM | Reply

Lamp,

I accept technology. I'm glad I lived long enough to see this.

I've been a computer-head my entire working life.

In one lifetime, I watched television go from 3 channels with rabbit ears on top of the set to what we have today. That's an unbelievable technological leap when you really stop and think about it.

I wonder when another generation will experience changes as transforming as the ones I witnessed firsthand.

Who else remembers adjusting the black and white TV set to stop the picture from rolling?

And now we're watching AI emerge in real time.

Like the Borg said in Star Trek The Next Generation,

"Resistance is futile."

#16 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 02:21 AM | Reply

Lamp.

Really, you sound ridiculous suggesting you're too enlightened to accept AI.

#17 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 02:26 AM | Reply

@#15 ... You base your opinions on what other people think? ..

Huh?

Where did that come from?

Am I conversing with a hallucinating AI?



#18 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:33 AM | Reply

@#16 ... I accept technology. ...

As do I. But only technology that benefits me, not technology that benefits Big Tech.


What else yer got?

#19 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:35 AM | Reply

Lamp,

Is running down AI and pretending it's not a tsunami about to transform the way humans work now the fashionable position for self-described "independent thinkers" who consider themselves intellectually superior?

Because from where I'm sitting, a lot of it sounds less like deep thinking and more like denial wrapped in smugness.

You don't have to worship AI to recognize reality.

The industrial revolution changed physical labor.

Computers changed information and communication.

AI is going to change cognitive labor.

Humans will still be here working alongside AI.

Technology keeps advancing whether we approve of it or not.

#20 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 02:35 AM | Reply

@#17 ... Really, you sound ridiculous suggesting you're too enlightened to accept AI. ...

I did not say I was too enlightened to accept AI.

Where did you dig that up from?

#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:36 AM | Reply

Lamp,

"I did not say I was too enlightened to accept AI"

And you're worried about AI lying?

#22 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 02:46 AM | Reply

@#22 ... And you're worried about AI lying? ...

You're not worried about that?

Given how widely AI is being used, you do not have a concern that it may prevaricate?


#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:49 AM | Reply

ChatGPT became teen's 'illicit drug coach' before death, lawsuit claims
www.usatoday.com

... The family of a college student who died after ChatGPT allegedly told him to mix illicit drugs is suing the AI chatbot's developer, OpenAI, for their son's death. ...

#24 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:51 AM | Reply

Their teenage sons died by suicide. Now, they are sounding an alarm about AI chatbots (2025)
www.npr.org

#25 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:52 AM | Reply

I could go on ...

#26 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 02:52 AM | Reply

@#20 ... Is running down AI and pretending it's not a tsunami about to transform the way humans work now the fashionable position for self-described "independent thinkers" who consider themselves intellectually superior? ...

Well, thank-you for considering me as an independent thinker. Unlike you, I do not worship anything.

Good to see you admit that about me and implicitly, and not in a good way, yourself. Why do you seem to have an issue with an independent thinker?

But do I consider myself intellectually superior?

Hardly.

I know, and have often cited, most often cited, many people who I think are quite more knowledgeable than I am. I fully admit that I am not the brightest light bulb around here. That's why I cite those who I think are more knowledgeable. Duh.

But how might that enter into what I post, besides you apparently wanting to abase me and the comments I post?

What else yer got?



#27 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-05-14 03:14 AM | Reply

Just accept it.

#7 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:49 AM |

The same people that were OUTRAGED over the demands on the electrical grid by EV's will just lie back and take it from data centers.

#28 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-05-14 10:06 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

AI is currently in the same stage as things like astrology and alchemy were before they eventually became astronomy and chemistry. They served useful but limited purposes, but were disasterous when people tried to apply them beyond their limitations. Unfrotunately, it's going to take a huge systemic failure before society decides to take it out of the hands of those driven by short term business greed.

#29 | Posted by sentinel at 2026-05-14 12:17 PM | Reply

Lamp,

"Well, thank-you for considering me as an independent thinker."

Don't flatter yourself.

Notice I put "independent thinker" in quotes.

The quotation marks were there for a reason.

#30 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 12:56 PM | Reply

The Pet Rock of the 21st Century?

All Hype No substance?

What Exactly do these massive Energy and Water Consuming Facilities DO?

What is the Purpose behind the Buildout?

Most Importantly, What happens to all of these massive Buildings when new Technologies make Huge Data centers Obsolete?

Shopping Malls were Huge until they Weren't.

#31 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-05-14 01:06 PM | Reply

Lamp,

You mentioned a family blaming AI for influencing their teenage son into using illicit drugs.

If the boy had used a gun to kill himself, there are people who would blame the gun and argue the solution is removing guns from society.

But neither guns nor AI are going to disappear.

They are powerful tools that can be used responsibly or irresponsibly.

What society needs is better education on using both responsibly.

#32 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:12 PM | Reply

What society needs is better education on using both responsibly.
#32 | Posted by BillJohnson

Who pays?

Shouldn't the gun owners pay for that, as they are the ones who need the education.

Or did you envision the gun manufacturers paying for that.

You probably didn't think about implementing your idea, at all.

#33 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-14 01:15 PM | Reply

Eff,

"Shopping malls were huge until they weren't."

Land and buildings have been getting repurposed or torn down for centuries.

That just leads to new construction projects and different kinds of jobs.

#34 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:15 PM | Reply

"If the boy had used drugs to kill himself, there are people who would blame drugs and argue the solution is removing drugs from society."
--BillJohnson, probably.

#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-14 01:16 PM | Reply

Until someone posts something I find worth responding to, I am done here.

#36 | Posted by BillJohnson at 2026-05-14 01:21 PM | Reply

"Land and buildings have been getting repurposed or torn down for centuries."

^
"The climate has always changed."

#37 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-05-14 01:27 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort