More from the article ...

... These judges are scrutinizing the conduct of federal prosecutors and the legitimacy of high-profile probes that appear to stem from Trump's personal vendettas or his efforts to bend perceived adversaries -- like the Fed's Jerome Powell or Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz -- to his will.

As the judges themselves acknowledge, it's a highly unusual review of a process in which prosecutors are typically at the zenith of their authority. They can pursue grand jury investigations on mere suspicions, untethered from the factual requirements they would need to prove a case at trial.

But even grand jury probes have limits. Subpoenas have to be relevant and reasonable, the Supreme Court has ruled. They can't be used to harass or punish political opponents or cast around for sensitive information like a roving inquisition.

But judges have said time and again that the Trump administration has taken this impermissible path. ...

#@1 ... As the judges themselves acknowledge, it's a highly unusual review of a process in which prosecutors are typically at the zenith of their authority. They can pursue grand jury investigations on mere suspicions, untethered from the factual requirements they would need to prove a case at trial. ...

Getting an indictment by a Grand Jury is easy.

The defense has no presence in the proceedings, just the prosecutor.

So the prosecutor can basically say anything, and it won't be challenged.

Until, apparently, now.

Kudos to the Judges.