Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, November 11, 2026

A soldier in the US Army has been arrested on suspicion of offences under the National Security Act which relate to Russia, British counter-terror police have said.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Wonder if the Brits will prosecute this US soldier on charges of spying for Russia just to make sure Trump doesn't give him a reward. edition.cnn.com/2026/11/10/u ...

[image or embed]

-- emptywheel (@emptywheel.bsky.social) 2:28 PM · Nov 10, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Trump's never been a soldier. C'mon man.

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-11-10 09:07 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Actually, for an active duty military member the penalties can be really high for treason...though not sure it is treason if not at war.

#2 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-11-12 06:38 AM | Reply

"...though not sure it is treason if not at war."

Might wanna check with Julius and Ethel...

#3 | Posted by Angrydad at 2026-11-12 02:44 PM | Reply

Spies don't get executed any more, they get traded.

Julius and Ethel were civilians, that's why they got send to Old Sparky.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-11-12 02:52 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed to set an example, like the unfortunate duo Sacco and Vanzetti, who were also seated in Thomas Edison's Rocking Chair at Sing-Sing decades earlier.

Spies, civilian or military, must never be executed because they have information in their heads they can reveal to CI agents at a later date. We cannot interrogate a corpse.

Spies, civilian or military, can also be traded, if they were valuable.

Iranians who spied for Israel over the past two years were simply executed. The Mossad did not seek to trade for them, as Tel Aviv saw them as disposable assets ("useful idiots"). And the Iranian regime saw this and so made examples of them, rather than incarcerate them for future interrogations or trades.

"FUNNY 2"

#5 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-11-12 03:27 PM | Reply

The crime of "treason" is the most difficult case to prosecute in the US because this crime is only applicable during a Congressionally-declared state of war. Moreover, there must be at least two eyewitnesses to the alleged crime that can testify in court.

Today, prosecutors and pundits throw around the words "treasonous" or "traitor" more as descriptives, rather than legal code.

When the UK faced legal difficulties prosecuting Brits who were supporting the Nazi cause, the culprits didn't commit treason per se under UK law, so their parliament enacted the Treachery Act (1940), which covered their offenses.

The Treachery Act is something the US deperately needs, because that would have covered Dummkopf Trumpf's treacherous activities with the Russians, Israelis, oligarchs, Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Mawxell etc.

"FUNNY 2"

#6 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-11-12 04:46 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort