Back when you actually got books of coupons that I could take to the Chinese takeout place up the block and trade for weed.

#21 | Posted by TFDNihilist

Bring back S&H Green Stamps.

It's time to get all those progressives out of the White House. They have been there too long.

#15 | Posted by boaz

Boaz counts to four.

At least with Trump, we know who is in charge.

#13 | Posted by boaz

So he'll be taking all the blame for everything that happens in his term? Good to know.

THE UNITED STATES SHOULD HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. THIS IS NOT OUR FIGHT. LET IT PLAY OUT. DO NOT GET INVOLVED!"

Damn it's so good to finally have someone in office who thinks like me.

#1 | Posted by boaz

Guess what, Boaz? This socialist pretty much agrees with you, as do quite a number of liberals I know.

Quoting a Retorter, Swallow it.

Go back to your bathroom stall fantasies like a good Trumper. And quit thinking you're something special.

If he made it to 89 without a sexual harassment charge, good for him.

I completely oppose this decision.

Ask Clownshack if you're gonna keep blowing him like that.

#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Never occurred to me. Keep me out of your fantasy life.

5. The anesthetic of your choice is always indicated before the Retort.

1. I've read the article. What specifically triggered you?

If you're thinking that catching a Democrat in a racist moment is earth shattering, if you know history, why?

This is kind of an odd choice since she just dumped Lewzer Jr.

#5 | Posted by REDIAL

Gets her out of the way.

Does she know a word of Greek, other than what it takes to order a Gyro platter?

Unfortunately, these days such letters from knowledgeable people are worthless.

75 libbie Nobel laureates.
#2 | Posted by MSgt

Off the top of your head, can you even name two?

12. You wonder if I've been around here.

Here's a blast from the past. World's best guitar:

Good luck finding a jury to try this guy.

Voir dire: "Have you or a family member ever been treated unfairly by a health insurance company?"

Wow, didnt know you were a military hater/jealous person.

Noted.

#47 | Posted by boaz

Why'd you join, Boaz? Learn a trade? Get an education? Get benefits? Military is a great way to do so. But if that's the motivation, yes I question it to some degree, especially when someone turns to hate their own country, presuming they ever loved it.

Not jealous at all. Quoting an old Rockford Files, "The nice thing about being a civilian is that you outrank generals and colonels."

Sit down liberals, you arent in control anymore.

It's our turn now.

#26 | Posted by boaz

What did Republicans do the last time they had control of three branches of government? They couldn't keep control of their own House of Representatives perpetually over the last few years.

"Our turn"? And liberals are "evil."

Here's an insult: You're a pathetic excuse for an American citizen, your jobs-corps service be damned.

I know a good many 1.5-generation Korean Americans who are Trump supporters, who are also serious Christians. But they don't insult Democrats or liberals. Imagine that.

Millions of immigrants more patriotic than Boaz. There it is. Who choose to read papers like the New York Times. You know, because they want to stay informed and not be pandered to like a child.

Pathetic.

And it's interesting, all you have is insults about it.

But you do you I guess.

#11 | Posted by boaz

If I'm posting facts, such as the reading level of your favorite news source--which you've admitted you like because it sounds right to you--and you're taking them as insults, that's not my problem.

Source for 8.

"readability across Britain's top papers:

The Sun: Reading age around 8
The Mirror: Reading age around 10
The Daily Mail: Reading age 10-11
The Daily Express: Reading age 12
The Times: Reading age 16

Notice how the tabloidy Sun, Mirror and Daily Mail sit well below adult levels at 8-11 years old. Even upmarket papers like The Times only reach around 16."

2. That's hard to accept when the jumping-off point for a debate is the latest trans news from the Daily Mail.

Who has that on a news feed? Or wakes up to check out the latest?

Boaz, I don't think you know what a debate is. Did you ever see one in school or on TV? Did you know there are rules? And the winner is who makes the best argument with support of the facts that are available to both sides?

You might have been a badass at whatever you were doing overseas, working under terms of engagement. And you might feel like an Internet warrior and a defender of freedom and truth here.

But a good debater must have a grasp of basic knowledge, and some literature and philosophy are helpful too.

Oddsmakers would not view you favorably, Boaz.

1. That's the PG-13 version. You're dealing with people's fantasy lives here.

Evita.
Fidel.
Che.
Mittens.

Or maybe she had a recognizable, unique, and marketable first name.

Simple answer.

Oh and calling someone by their first name only isn't treating them as a child. What orifice did you pull that from BillJohnson???

#29 | Posted by LauraMohr

NW

Wow. To all of it.

I think my favorite part of the above was Alexandrite accusing Miranda47 of being 50, as in older than dirt.

"I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now."

We'd be ahead of the game if the teen Ivanka had done the same.