Hans is attacking the source. NOBODY is surprised.

#12 | Posted by BellRinger

It's an opinion piece. The Author is the SOURCE of authority here.

There's no polling or issue data. There is no analysis beyond "here are the issues I think voters care about."

The Author is the SOLE SOURCE of authority here.

No wonder you are dumb enough to believe anything. Facts, evidence, and basic logic are not something you understand.

Democrats have moved so far right it's become embarrassing.

And yet somehow Donner, the retarded person is losing to a guy that said that by double digits in the betting markets ...

www.realclearpolling.com

#42 | Posted by Bluewaffles

Are the odds as good as they were for Hillary?

2 Questions he couldn't answer...so he goes to 39 minutes of swaying awkwardly like some incel in the corner of a house party.

"Feeding state secrets to our enemies is ALMOST as bad as that time Kamala didn't cite a source in a paper properly!"
-Jeff Epstein Bellringer

Ever notice that Jeff Bellringer never criticizes Trump or posts negative stories about him?

Palestinian casualties since Oct 2023 = 42,227 (half are women and children); injured = 98,464.

#7 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS

This ONLY includes those killed or injured by direct military attacks.

Another couple hundred thousands have died from deteriorating conditions on the ground.

Wanna argue that Trump's transgressions are worse? Fine. Have at it.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger

Wait...you think that's an argument?

Rape? Felonies? Raping underage girls?! Fraud? Election Interference? Stealing national secrets?

You think it's JUST an argument that these are worse than Plagiarism?! Like it's not somehow intrinsically true?

HOW ------ UP IS YOUR MORAL COMPASS?!

But we all know you're voting for the------------.

(Time for Bellringer to change his Alias...again...but he isn't going to live this down.)

"I'm voting for the pedophile!"
-Jeff Bellringer Epstein

I like you like me to provide receipts? Ah, never mind. Every time I have in the past you just Pooh Pooh the evidence staring you in the face. You've always demonstrated a love affair with left wing government partnering with the private sector to censor disfavored speech.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger

Oh Jeffy, are you still salty the REPUBLICAN APPOINTED Supreme Court said that wasn't happening?

Twitter User: "I'm a fake doctor and eating rat poison cures COVID! Do it!"
Jeff: "Free Speech!"
Twitter User: "I'm a Russian troll farm trying to stir up violence!"
Jeff: "Free Speech!"
Twitter User: "The Republican Supreme Court ignores the Constitution."
Jeff: "BAN THEM! BAN THEM AND ARREST THEM!"
Twitter User: "Cisgender."
Jeff: "EXECUTE THEM!"

The only real difference is, today, the Dem party takes Reps to court over rumors whereas they ignore ALLLLLLLL of the evidence of any wrongdoing by their own party. And, based on reactions to all of the evidence of Dem wrongdoing, liberal voters ignore it all too but have no problem hypocritically calling out Reps for doing the same things.

#40 | Posted by humtake

I've got a LOT of pictures of Trump with Epstein to show you.
I've got a certain affidavit from a girl saying she was 13 at the time.
I've got a jury verdict for sexual assault.
I've got a court judgment for fraud.
Do you want me to keep going? I've got the receipts.

Well, US Dems may get what they want, the eradication of Israel. All while screaming that genocide is bad.

#2 | Posted by humtake

Seriously? Biden and Harris bend over backward to supply Israel with money and weapons. We basically PAY for their Iron Dome.

And there's no one in the region capable to putting a serious dent in the Israeli army.

What crack are you on?

Just like Hunter's laptop that was Russian disinformation, amirite? Hint...I'm not. It wasn't Russian disinformation but Dems ignored it completely and have fought hard to keep it under the covers.

#46 | Posted by humtake

Russian Bots told Humtake that Hunter's laptop had bombshell stuff on it and he still believes it!

Turned out to be rather dull and nothing to do with Joe Biden...but those Russian Bots are still way more appealing to idiots like Humtake.

Hey Humtake, didn't X take down JD Vance's hacked info?

Cut the crap Corky. You've been selling this FDRish rhetoric since 2008 with each nominee of the Democratic party. We haven't had a FDRish candidate in reality. Aren't you tired of shilling for the DNC?? I mean seriously.

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr

I'm with Laura.

Democrats have very few solid policy positions to actually address young men's economic prospects.

Harris should be shouting from the rooftops about taking on corporate price gouging and fair pay for blue collar workers.

But she isn't. Price gouging is an afterthought and there is nothing for blue collar worker pay.

#5 You were the trend setter calling for Trumps assassination. Did you forget?

#7 | Posted by gracieamazed

And yet, the two shooters were both Republicans. Odd...

I'm sure Bellringer is just too busy to talk about this...

Here is a good example of what the author is talking about:

Sept 28 - Oct 8 - 600 registered voters - Fabrizio, Lee & Associates/GBAO (paid by Wall Street Journal) - Georgia - Harris +2
Oct 6 - Oct 9 - 800 likely voters - Fabrizio, Lee & Associates/McLaughlin & Associates (paid by Donald Trump) - Georgia - Trump +1

Who will win the presidency?
2016 Election Forecast
projects.fivethirtyeight.com

...
Chance of winning
Hillary Clinton - 71.4%

Donald Trump - 28.6%
...

#3 | Posted by LampLighter

Nate Silver is no longer with 538.

And that actually matched internal polling from the Trump campaign in 2016. He still had a good chance to win and he did.

Their predictive model accounts for polling error and weights the polls. So that's why they gave him a still solid chance.

Corky, I know you're a bit slow... it's been said a few times though...

This isn't about comparing her to Trump... it's about cheerleading for a mediocre candidate as if they were a world class statesman.

#78 | Posted by kwrx25

It's about cheerleading a competent candidate.

Do you understand what that is?

Is Toyota doing this because it didn't work? No.
Is Toyota doing this because employees didn't like it? No.
Toyota is doing this because of whiny idiots like Boaz frothing at the mouth online.

#4 Sycopphant That's not rue. There may be some never Trumpers voting for her espeecially among Republicans, but many of us like her policies. She and Walz actually want to promote and help the middleclass and poor. Also Trump's giving tax breaks to the rich needs to be reversed. The rich and big corporations need to pay more in taxes, they can afford it and still be rich. zsge aslo plans to stop prrice gouging by companies or are you agaunst that too. We need to vote blue across the board. A blue Congress, Senate and Presidency will or should start passing laws that help the average American. Also we can impeach Alito and Thomas and get some rational judges in there. Trickle economics never worked and never will.

#42 | Posted by Ronnie68

What policies?

She only has a few. And I like what she has.

But she has been so careful in announcing any provocative or truly progressive policies that she isn't giving us any real transformative reason to vote for her. It's "she's not Trump and basically just another Democrat." Obama at least had the Affordable Care Act.

To be replaced with what? Being decided by two or three cities in overcrowded blue states?

No thanks..

#49 | Posted by boaz

As opposed to empty land?

No, that totally sounds fair.

Companies can't (not won't) pay living wages if the customer is not willing to bear the cost.

And honestly, why does a 16-year-old high school kid need a living wage? Activists demanding that they do will ensure that high school kids are no longer able to get jobs.

To put it differently, mandating that employers pay a living wage ensures that those whose labor value is below that amount are no longer legally employable.

#10 | Posted by madbomber

They totally can pay a living wage and not raise prices. Literally prices all over the country and in other countries prove it. See #4

And how many people working there are 16? There are a TON of people working there who are adults and use it as their only source of income. We're talking 30, 40, 50 year olds.

And that last line is ridiculous. I can barely think of anyone whose labor value is worth less than a living wage. Maybe special needs individuals?

If this happened to the Democrats, she'd be out of the party.

Instead she is the face of the Republican Party.

She's running an awful campaign.

There are no progressive ideas.

She refuses to distance herself from Biden on even bad decisions.

She refuses to really go after Trump for his glaringly obvious weak points.