If you're asking me, I don't know what republicans are calling it.

I'm just focusing on what Spain wants and why.

15

what's the definition of "the campaign"? It doesn't start until the convention? I don't know but I suspect the campaign is defined broader than that...meaning it starts long before the convention.

and nobody really cares about that claim anyway. He WAS critical and NOW he supports him specifically because of these tariffs.

Is that accurate?

-Before, or after Fain spoke at the Republican National Convention?

before, when he spoke at the Democratic national convention

-Meanwhile, Honda, Nissan, Toyota, Subaru, and Mitsubishi all have plants in the US.

does this tariff apply to cars those companies make here? And by make I mean assemble.

-A tariff is a tax on Americans.

on cars made here?

-Dude's a Moron.

what do you think you know he doesn't?

I'm not pro or against anything except I support keeping good jobs here in the US if it can be done realistically.

What's the downside to this, other than you don't like anybody supporting Trump for any reason?

-Republicans think it will hurt minorities and immigrants more than it will hurt themselves and their own children.

I don't think they believe this hurts them in any way. Instead, it hurts "other people" and you can define that any way you want....but I don't think republicans believe they are sacrificing anything.

Except for those who've lost their jobs.............

I don't think they believe they are going to be on the receiving end of any "collateral damage".

-Why should working people vote for the Democrats other than to oppose Trump?

good question.

-Trumpy paid El Salvador $6 million dollars.

I didn't know that.

That answers the question. Trump gave something to El Salvador in exchange for this.

Link?

"Alien Enemies Act of 1798"

not used since WW II.

Interesting.

The US can call these folks gang members but that doesn't mean the El Salvadoran Government has to.

So why is the El Salvadoran Govt incarcerating these guys like this? They are choosing to do this......because they trust Trump when he calls them gang members?

I can't read the article but the lawsuit would make more sense if the respective state school boards were a plaintiff in this....maybe they have their own suit and are planning on moving forward.

Kansas gets sued by the school districts every decade or so over school funding because there is a constitutional requirement to "adequately fund" public schools and when the schools deem the funding to be inadequate....a suit gets filed....and I think the courts routinely side with the school districts.

but I don't think the teachers' union does it.....but rather the school districts themselves.

10

ouch!

I know this is way off base but I would definitely hit it with that CNN gal.......

You'd be angry too if you cared about the Country and where it's headed. Just sayin

Is that why he's angry?

Are you angry, as well?

I care about the country and where it's headed.

But I can't be angry 24/7 forever.

But.....I care about the country and where it's headed.

So.......you're angry all the time? I guess if you're not, then you don't care about the country nor where it's headed.

-Your theory assumes Harris was lying, while Trump was telling the truth.

Promise a tax plan she knows has little chance of passing but still wants to campaign on it while still enlisting the support of billionaires she promising TO CORKY AND DANFORTH she's going to make pay their fair share?

Wouldn't be the first time a democrat succeeded at that.

I have to prep for tomorrow, fellas.

Have a good night.

-That's still a Whataboutism; a logical fallacy which isn't a rebuttal to the argument made in the article outlining the history of an effort to undermine democracy in this country by CERTAIN billionaires.

Billionaires he doesn't have the nuts to identity.

And it's not like we don't know who they are but he doesn't name them. Another subject, regardless.

What in the article have I argued with? I have no problem with it.

Jesus ... ... ...

39

You keep co-mingling joe 6 pack voters and billionaires.

And lecturing me about reality

-YOU'RE the one imagining she's telling us one thing, and the folks in private meetings something else.

And you're imagining that doesn't happen.

Are

You

Serious?

-----

LOL

-Your entire theory is grounded in a fantasy scenario;

It's a fantasy that a billionaire hedge fund manager had a candid conversation with Harris before handing her $50 million?

They just watched her speeches on CNN and said "he'll, I like her. Honey, get my checkbook!"

Yeah, that's how it works.

Fantasy?

Unbelievable

"And telling them that."

I asked you earlier to tell me what those billionaire want. You didn't answer.

Now you imagine you know what Harris told them. You were in the meetings?

That's great. Why didn't you just say so?

Tell us what they want and tell us what Harris told them while accepting their $50 million contributions.

Go ahead ... ... ...

-We get it though, YOUR party is SO bad now, all you've got is to CLAIM with no evidence that the other party is just as bad.

LOL

You'll never get this or pretend to be this stupid. Doesn't matter

This isn't about the goodness of the GOP or that the democrats are just as bad.

It's about billionaires. It's your insipid article. It's about billionaires.

Slam the GOP all you want. I won't argue a bit. And why can't Hartman name the billionaires? Why not call them out individually?

"or have a Jeffy read it to you."

Wow, that guy owns you.

How many times a day do you reference him when he's nowhere near?

Nobody is arguing the parties are the same

At most, the argument is that billionaires are billionaires.

No matter who they write $50 million checks to.

-Harris was saying she was going to raise their taxes.

She was telling you and me that.

But you don't know ---- about what she was telling them.