Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Top Democrats tell us their party is in its deepest hole in nearly 50 years -- and they fear things could actually get worse ...

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Republican are concerned about the lackluster fundraising by state Sen. Randy Fine, their candidate in next week's special election in Florida's 6th District.

[image or embed]

-- NBC News (@nbcnews.com) March 24, 2025 at 9:30 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

...

- - - The party has its lowest favorability ever.

- - - No popular national leader to help improve it.

- - - Insufficient numbers to stop most legislation in Congress.

- - - A durable minority on the Supreme Court.

- - - Dwindling influence over the media ecosystem, with right-leaning podcasters and social media accounts ascendant.

- - - Young voters are growing dramatically more conservative.

- - - A bad 2026 map for Senate races.

- - - Democratic Senate retirements could make it harder for the party to flip the House, with members tempted by statewide races.

- - - There are only three House Republicans in districts former Vice President Harris won in 2024, a dim sign for a Democratic surge. There were 23 eight years ago in seats Hillary Clinton won.

- - - And, thanks to the number of people fleeing blue states, the math for a Dem to win the presidency will just get harder in 2030.

Why it matters: Both parties " after losing the White House, Senate and House " suffer and search for salvation. But rarely does healing seem so hard and redemption so distant.

- - - Doug Sosnik -- a senior adviser to President Bill Clinton, and widely followed thinker on political megatrends -- told us this is Dems' deepest hole in at least the 45 years since Ronald Reagan's victory in 1980. Sosnik said the 2024 election was at least as much a repudiation of Democrats as it was a victory for Trump.

...



#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-24 06:19 PM | Reply

Emanuel told us Democrats have to stop being a liberal-only party for liberal-only voters: "We used to have liberal, moderate and conservative Democrats. Now we're basically a liberal party, because African American and Hispanic voters went out the back door. They're the ones who walked as we became more liberal."
Nail on the head.

Dems need to focus on the stuff that matters to most Americans instead of chastising and lecturing voters on how they are deficient.

Bill Clinton did an excellent job at that. Maybe Manchin or some other Dem from a southern or other sheethole state can pick up the banner.

#2 | Posted by censored at 2025-03-24 06:24 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Oh, and no more Dem ladies for prez, please. They had two terrible nominees in the last three presidential elections because "it was their turn."

Latino and Black males can't stomach it; hurts their fragile egos. Time to cater to the lowest common denominator so we can get a Dem in the Oval Office and try to right the ship that the GOP is so insistent on sinking.

#3 | Posted by censored at 2025-03-24 06:31 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

For the moment, I like Pritzker. Or AOC. Newsome is done, Schumer is feckless. Who are the most popular politicians in America? Sanders? AOC? Why are they the most popular?

#4 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-03-24 06:42 PM | Reply

@#2 ... Bill Clinton did an excellent job at that. ...

I heard one commentator say that fmr Pres Clinton was a Liberal in his heart, but a Conservative (the pre-MAGA definition of Conservative) in his head.


#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-24 06:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#4 ... Schumer is feckless. ...

Agreed.

#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-24 06:44 PM | Reply

Selling out the American left worked, for a moment. But then it had been sold out, and the right went full-on fascist

#7 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-03-24 06:44 PM | Reply

People like Censored can go ---- off. You're a ------- coward.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-03-24 10:27 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

People like Censored can go [fudge] off. You're a [fudging] coward.
#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead

How's the Dem bravery working out so far? Locked out of all three branches of government with the GOP attacking century old progressive policies like social security, environmental laws, health care, etc. Disenfranchising voters left and right so Dems have next to no chance of regaining that kind of power in a generation.

But the Dems are Sooooo very brave! Putting up candidates based on what they have between their legs, even though a sizeable chunk of their own base can't stand those candidates for that very reason. Someone catch me, I'm going to swoon!

#9 | Posted by censored at 2025-03-24 10:36 PM | Reply

What do you mean the Democratic party needs to not be liberal?? There are very few liberals in the Democratic party and they get relegated to the back burner. Nah. The Democratic party needs to stop being Republican lite. That's what is killing the Democratic party. Not that it's too liberal. Just sayin.

#10 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-24 10:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Are you going to vote for Jill Stein some more? No reasonable compromise is good enough for you, so why should Dems lose votes by adopting your outlier positions?

#11 | Posted by censored at 2025-03-24 10:56 PM | Reply

Are you going to vote for Jill Stein some more? No reasonable compromise is good enough for you, so why should Dems lose votes by adopting your outlier positions?

Posted by censored at 2025-03-24 10:56 PM | Reply

The Democratic party strategy of late sure has gone swimmingly right Censored?? I mean seriously. You would think that reversing the current direction they are headed might just be a winning one don't you think?? It can't be as bad as this one is. Just sayin

#12 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-03-24 11:38 PM | Reply

The Democratic party strategy of late sure has gone swimmingly right Censored??
#12 | Posted by LauraMohr

It wasn't my bright idea to make women think they were entitled to the Dem nomination.

But reason would suggest that the lefty folks who are unable to manage to win with even the the more liberal party (Dems) are unlikely to pull off a win with the more moderate voters of the general election.

#13 | Posted by censored at 2025-03-25 12:01 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Bill Clinton teamed with Newt Gingrich to settle on some legislation that's been horrid for communities of color in the long run. Yeah, that Gingrich, who 30 years ago was advocating his Contract on America and codifying the vilification of Democrats. preTrumpian.

That Clinton. First black president, my lily white ass.

And if it wasn't for the one drop rule, Obama wouldn't qualify either.

#14 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-03-25 12:52 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Double down on the TDS and MDS, don't go all wobbly now just cause it hasn't worked in the past.

#15 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-03-25 01:02 AM | Reply

@#15 ... Double down on the TDS and MDS ...

I understand what TDS means.

The MAGA folk seem to use that acronym when they implicitly acknowledge that Pres Trump seems to be deranged.

But, MDS is new for me.


What mean ye with MDS?

thx.

#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-03-25 02:39 AM | Reply

This thread is the reason Democrats lost. I can believe the tone deaf responses.

#2 and #3, if he meant them, by Censored are incredible.

Keep that up, wont be a Democrat party in 20 years.

Hint to Censored: If you keep denegrating the voters you need, why would they vote for you?

#17 | Posted by boaz at 2025-03-25 07:24 AM | Reply | Funny: 1

What do you mean the Democratic party needs to not be liberal?? There are very few liberals in the Democratic party and they get relegated to the back burner. Nah. The Democratic party needs to stop being Republican lite. That's what is killing the Democratic party. Not that it's too liberal. Just sayin.

#10 | Posted by LauraMohr

And responses like this are why the Dems are losing. I cant imagine this jackass really thinks the Democrat party isn't liberal.

Problem is, she is using a definition of liberal that's not progressive, so it ends up making her look like an idiot.

#18 | Posted by boaz at 2025-03-25 07:26 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I don't want any party that you'd vote for to be the party I am a part of.

#19 | Posted by YAV at 2025-03-25 07:27 AM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

Yeah, Boaz can fcnk off

#20 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-03-25 07:59 AM | Reply

Hint to Censored: If you keep denegrating the voters you need, why would they vote for you?
#17 | Posted by boaz

Calling it how it is.

A sizeable portion of the Dem base/general election likely supporters will never vote for a woman. And others have difficulty voting for candidates from non-sheethole states (e.g., Massachusetts or California) because they feel those candidates are out of touch or because of insecurities regarding their own states.

Dems gotta take all that, and more, into account when figuring which candidates to field in the general election.

#21 | Posted by censored at 2025-03-25 08:24 AM | Reply

The reason is simple.

Dems can promote social causes on the liberal side but don't promote the liberal causes that drive voter turn out: workers.

They sold out to corporate donors. Even Harris scaled back her messaging to appease corporate overlords.

Why should working people vote for the Democrats other than to oppose Trump?

#22 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-03-25 10:40 AM | Reply

When I hear Democrats talking about "the rich" or Oligarchy,

I saw somewhere that 75% of Billionaires are Democrats and something like 88% give to Democratic political causes.

The most hypocritical party there is.

#23 | Posted by boaz at 2025-03-25 12:18 PM | Reply

"I saw somewhere that 75% of Billionaires are Democrats and something like 88% give to Democratic political causes."

It didn't even occur to you to ask what add those percentages for Republicans, did it?

You're just not very good at this thing called "perspective."

You have lived in the safety bubble for far too long.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-25 12:20 PM | Reply

more than one sample has democrats favorbility going from 29 % to 27 %

it's a real shame... hee hee.....I mean it's a....HAAAAAAAA

really sad BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

#25 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-03-25 03:25 PM | Reply

#24 | Posted by snoofy a

so if boaz says that 75 % of billionaires are democrats...

what does that leave as far as GOP

you can use your fingers and toes OR even chisumbovk.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

#26 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-03-25 03:27 PM | Reply

Shrimpdicklick must love the fact that Trump is down 40 points in the youth vote.

What they see now, everyone will soon see.

Well, not the Cult. The Cult only sees what they are told to see.

#27 | Posted by Corky at 2025-03-25 03:29 PM | Reply

I saw somewhere that
#23 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Thanks, but at this point in the sentence, it's apparent the rest of your comment is gonna be a bunch of bullshht.

#28 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-25 03:29 PM | Reply

so if boaz says ...
#26 | POSTED BY SHRIMPdick

ZOMG! If Boaz said it, it must be true!!

God Knows he reads the finest in rightwing tabloids.

#29 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-03-25 03:31 PM | Reply

"Newsome is done"...is he? Or is he playing 4D chess. He sees a lot of getable young male voters in the podcast sphere. He has a new podcast, how do you attract a different audience from the Pod Save or other liberal podcasts who are basically only speaking to liberals? Get Kirk and Bannon and other voices influential in MAGAtland, introduce yourself to their listeners, sound reasonabel while you show the liberals who will listen to your podcast how insane they are. If Newsom plays this right he could peel off a chunk of the softer Rogan bros, and bring them back to the Dems. He is the liberal governor of one of the most liberal states in the country, time to tack to the center for a Presidential run. After all, he will have to win all those Biden to Dotard swing states. How do you do that? In 2025 you do that in exactly the way he currently is. I don't like it, but I understand it.

#30 | Posted by _Gunslinger_ at 2025-03-25 03:35 PM | Reply

"boaz says that 75 % of billionaires are democrats"

Boaz is the kind of guy who says 75% of the civilians he killed were terrorists; the rest were women and children.

#31 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-25 03:44 PM | Reply

-Why should working people vote for the Democrats other than to oppose Trump?

good question.

#32 | Posted by eberly at 2025-03-25 03:49 PM | Reply

Why should working people vote for the Democrats, other than to oppose the destruction of the United States?

Beats me. They voted to destroy it, now they want to keep it?

#33 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-03-25 03:50 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort