You are such a dumb ---. Contextualize it all you want, in those two instances the US did facilitate regime change and the outcome was good for Hawaii and decent for Puerto Rico.
#186 | Posted by BellRinger
Hawaii had a rebellion and rampant disease after the takeover brought the population from 500,000 to 40,000 native Hawaiians. (92% loss)
Puerto Rico isn't even a state and you all are freaking out over Bad Bunny being at the Super Bowl. We basically keep the territory under our thumb and have huge price increases on their goods. See the Jones Act. Then we took over local government and basically just took over their resources, wiped out their culture, and refuse to support them when a hurricane hits.
#255 | POSTED BY SYCOPHANT
Long term those were both successful. It's not a difficult concept. You really are a dumb ----
#258 | Posted by BellRinger
Wait wait wait...
Did you just say killing off the locals and stealing their resources was good in the long term?
#262 | Posted by Sycophant
When morons like Sycophant and Alexandrite see: posted by Bellringer, reading comprehension goes out the window. Case in point:
#268 | Posted by BellRinger
Notice Jeff switching topics again and avoiding the Fact Check?
I guess he really does root for just killing off the brown locals.
He's also taking a huge stake in McDonald's.
#7 | Posted by Corky
You mean a huge daily order.