Friday, October 04, 2024

Tax Cuts Are Primarily Responsible for the Increasing Debt

The need to increase the debt limit1 osts permanently outstripping revenues under projections based on current law. House Republican leaders have used this fact to call for spending cuts,3 but it does not address the true cause of rising debt: Tax cuts initially enacted during Republican trifectas in the past 25 years slashed taxes disproportionately for the wealthy and profitable corporations, severely federal revenues. In fact, relative to earlier projections, spending is down, not up. But revenues are down significantly more. Repyblican tax cuts for the rich greatly increased the debt and that created inflation. Spin it any way you want but that is simply the fact that Retry topublicans ALWAYS try to spin it differently but they are lying!suRPRISE! Whodathunkit?

Comments

No shitake.

#1 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-10-04 12:13 PM

Just remember...Clinton left office with a budget surplus.

W said he was going to kill the surplus and did just that AND spent trillions in the illegal Iraq war.

Obama reduced the deficit W left, but it was already structural thanks to W.

Sh*tler increased the deficit EVERY YEAR he was in office then used the pandemic to transfer hundreds of billions to the 1% through PPP loans and ERC credits.

Now he wants to cut taxes for the 1% and corporations even more and "pay" for it with tariffs that will cost the average family THOUSANDS in extra taxes per year.

#2 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-10-04 12:19 PM

What a crock. If anyone can show tax cuts resulting in a reduction of tax revenue then I will buy in.

Spending is absolutely out of control.

#3 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-10-04 01:18 PM

If anyone can show tax cuts resulting in a reduction of tax revenue

How could they not?

#4 | Posted by REDIAL at 2024-10-04 01:36 PM

" If anyone can show tax cuts resulting in a reduction of tax revenue "

Stephen Moore, the former WSJ editorial board member, and the moron behind "tax cuts increase revenue", was using NOMINAL dollars when he made that proclamation, a method that'll earn an "F" on an Econ 101 midterm.

Basically, if revenue was $1 trillion, and four years later it was $1 trillion AND ONE, that's the proof!!!

No accounting for inflation or population growth. None.

Hence, only morons believe that axiom.

#5 | Posted by Danforth at 2024-10-04 03:31 PM

What a crock. If anyone can show tax cuts resulting in a reduction of tax revenue then I will buy in.

Spending is absolutely out of control.

#3 | Posted by BellRinger at 2024-10-04 01:18 PM | Reply

You aren't even room temperature smart. The brownback experiment proves this one. What a Dummkopf Jeff is.

#6 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2024-10-04 03:36 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Mayorkas: FEMA Doesn't Have Enough Funding (52 comments)

Jill Stein: How and Why I Will Stop Kamala Harris Winning the White House (50 comments)

Report: Hezbollah's Chief Nasrallah 'suffocated in Agony' (45 comments)

Trump Still Hiding Long-Promised Medical Records (39 comments)

Dockworkers Suspend Strike (29 comments)

Bruce Springsteen Endorses Kamala Harris and Tim Walz (27 comments)

Jack Smith's Stunning New Evidence Against Trump (27 comments)

Video Shows Vance Claiming Trump Won 2020 Election (24 comments)