"The nominee for the Republican Party, Donald Trump, is a squalid figure, and the squalor is not subtle. His vileness, his lawlessness, and his malevolence are undisguised"

Gee, I wonder why Democrats keep trying to kill Trump. Where would they ever get the idea that Trump is an existential threat to the country and must be stopped by any means necessary?

"#6 | Posted by Corky"

Yeah, you are right. Pretty much every Republican I know donated to ActBlue. Regardless of this attempt at deflection, how are they getting radicalized against Trump only?

"Is this the Wide Stance heel clicker=toe tapper bunch of Republicans at the public restrooms ?
#9 | Posted by Corky"

No, these RINOs are all in the Democrat party now along with the bloodthirsty neocons like Dick Cheney. But, I do find it strange that you are trying to shame homosexuals when you actively promote them in your own party. I guess this is like how Dems love to use the n-word when referring to black GOP supporters.

"This alias has been here 6 days and acts like he owns the place.
#13 | Posted by tonyroma"

I was wondering where you ran off to. You want to answer the question now that you ran away from before:

"Please tell me, prior to our exchange, did you know that the audio (911 call in Ohio) was available of this incident or was this truly new information to you?"

"The call is as bogus as you are (the person on the call is LYING). Danforth spanked you butt all over that thread and you still can't sit down.
#15 | Posted by tonyroma"

You still did not answer the question. Just answer the question being asked rather than trying to deflect to Danforth's spin as he was just as ignorant on the topic as you.

"Please tell me, prior to our exchange, did you know that the audio (911 call in Ohio) was available of this incident or was this truly new information to you?"

I am not asking you whether you think the person was lying (irrelevant to the question being asked).

"#17 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

Yeah, that is why her staffers made Brett cut the interview short and Kamala sent away her staffer so she could be alone with her bottle of Stoli - because she looked so good.

Trump is up 17.2% in Poly market and their betting lines are spreading like Kamala's legs when asking Willy Brown for a promotion.

"Got a link?
#19 | Posted by LampLighter"

I always do:

"Her responses to his interrogation showed she was not to be f**ked with.
#21 | Posted by LampLighter"

Her responses and lack of composure showed she is unfit to lead mentally and emotionally.

We will get the true feelings from her team shortly - if they still do a Joe Rogan interview, it means they think she did well. If she now refuses to do a Joe Rogan interview, her team knows she bombed bigtime.

"So, it is Mr Baier giving his opinion of what occurred during the interview. And he seems to admit he blew it ("I had to dismount").
#24 | Posted by LampLighter"

I think you lack understanding of basic English if that is your interpretation of what he said. To dismount just means to end. Like dismounting a horse or a gymnast dismounting to end their routine.

Kamala looked terrible. She still had no specifics, just tried to talk about Trump, and lost emotional control. She won't be doing more interviews with anyone other than a sycophant reading off a script from this point forward.

"So, she stayed focused upon the issue at hand?
#28 | Posted by LampLighter"

Best part of the interview:

Heels-Up: You know what I mean
Brett: No, I don't

No one else knew either. That is what happens when you put a below room temp IQ into this type of position. Take the drinking problem and the poor emotional control on top of this and you have this -------- as the result.

All that said, she would stay make a far superior VP to Walz, but that is not really a compliment to Harris.

"I would like to point out that, the "below room temp IQ" that your alias cites, whooped fmr Pres Trump's derriere during the debate.
#31 | Posted by LampLighter"

Sorry to ruin your night with actual facts again, but here you go.

"Reuters can be trusted, but the interview aired at 6pm EDT on Fox News.
#34 | Posted by tonyroma"

The link and issue at hand was regarding the prior Trump/Harris debate, not her disastrous interview tonight. For the snap reaction to that, it is better to look at Polymarket where Trump is now up by 22.7% - a widening over about 4% from the pre-interview spreads. The market has spoken and she bombed.

"We might have been born at night, but it wasn't last night.
#35 | Posted by Hans"

Do you lick you fingers clean after flinging your poo?

The link embedded in my link goes directly to Reuters, which the article simply restates the results of that survey. Nice try though.

"#40 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

What I posted in #33:

"Tuesday night's debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump has been touted as either a draw or a Harris victory by mainstream media pundits, but Independent and undecided voters saw the evening differently. Multiple polls are showing that a majority of undecided voters either decided on backing Trump or leaned towards that decision following the debate. Reuters conducted interviews with a focus group of 10 undecided voters, six of whom said that they would support Trump following the debate. Only three said they would back Harris, while a final voter was still undecided."

vs. Gal's #40:
"Sept 11 (Reuters) - Kamala Harris was widely seen as dominating Tuesday's presidential debate against Republican former president Donald Trump, but a group of undecided voters remained unconvinced that the Democratic vice president was the better candidate.

Reuters interviewed 10 people who were still unsure how they were going to vote in the Nov. 5 election before they watched the debate. Six said afterward they would now either vote for Trump or were leaning toward backing him. Three said they would now back Harris and one was still unsure how he would vote.

www.reuters.com

#40 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

Do you want to tell the class what your posts ADDS to my #33 or refutes ANY PART of my #33? Or, are you just trying to agree with me very forcefully because I don't get why you made that post at all.

"It's widely considered heavily biased and flawed to skew right. Complete --------.
x.com
#41 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

IT IS A BETTING PLATFORM. If you honestly believe that, then you should buy up the Kamala Harris and make huge profits. Hell, it this was the case, you could arbitrage between this and the other better platforms and make tons of money - unless you want to claim ALL of these platforms are right leaning. Of course, that is just utter nonsense and you are left desperately seeking an out to explain why she continues to tank.

"All four who say they are now voting for or leaning toward Harris are women.
#43 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

Of course they are. Identity politics is all the Dems have. They don't have policies people support so you vote for the one with the same skin color or genitalia. They are the ultimate low information voters.

"Women voting for Harris is identity politics, but men voting for Trump is not. Got it.
#49 | Posted by Gal_Tuesday"

People vote for Trump because they want a good economy, no wars, and a closed border. None of that has to do with Trump being a man. When Trump says "if you are white and don't vote for me, you aren't actually white", you may have a point. Until then, identity politics is solely the domain of the Democrats.

BTW, Trump just hit +25% on Polymarket as insiders get the latest internal poll results.