Trump Asks Supreme Court to End Protection of Independent Agencies

Saturday, February 15, 2025

The Trump administration has told Congress they will move to ask the Supreme Court to overrule Humphrey's Executor, a 1935 ruling that protects workers in independent agencies from political retribution.

Posted by jpw at 10:30 PM | 29 COMMENTS | permalink

The Acting Solicitor General has notified Congress of DOJ's intent to ask #SCOTUS to overrule Humphrey's Executor--a major 1935 ruling upholding the independence of agencies like the FCC, FTC, NLRB, etc. fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldoc ... Because *less* independence is what we need ...

[image or embed]
-- Steve Vladeck (@stevevladeck.bsky.social) February 12, 2025 at 9:14 PM

Comments

The system destroying itself by removing Constitutional restraints on a single man would be the ultimate irony and sad end to our Republic.

Of course, the "patriotic" "small government conservatives" will cheer this because it tickles their confirmation bias of destroying government. However, they remain consistently blind to the power being created by that same very government that is concentrated in the hands of one person.

#1 | Posted by jpw at 2025-02-13 11:51 AM

Why People want this kind of authority in one person is baffling.

If a Democrat wins in the future they could undo everything by executive fiat.

This kind of thing can and does backfire on the fools who support it.

#2 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2025-02-13 05:05 PM

Why People want this kind of authority in one person is baffling.
If a Democrat wins in the future they could undo everything by executive fiat.

Pretty sure the idea is, once Republicans have achieved all their goals, there won't ever be another democratic president.

#3 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-02-13 05:16 PM

If anyone could think hard about how Trump has done so much crap in 3 weeks is because there has been a small army of ultra nationalist anti-government experts scheming for Trump for over 3 years. The Stop The Steal extremists that included so many of his cabinet nominees meets billionaire fascists and kleptocrats. So is Project 2025 all that is behind this whirlwind of crazy nominees, seemingly stream of consciousness drivel and creating chaos within federal agencies and the international community? Probably not.

Trump's off the cuff remark that "if elected there'd be no more need to worry about elections" isn't a harmless meaningless utterance. He's running the table with his nominees as they get confirmed. Next is Cash Patel who has the most convoluted financial disclosure statements, and has hated the FBI his entire life in the US. If Patel's nomination isn't rejected the march into American fascism will speed up double time.

Ultimately, Trump will be able to instigate enough turmoil that he might feel justified to declare martial law and accelerate his war on America. But only 30% of the US public thinks Trump's view for the country's right wing is OK. That 30% seems willing to start a civil war against the rest of America.

If Trump declares martial law, where will the guardrails be to constrain him? What is Congress doing to prepare for this potential debacle? They'd better prepare because this is the well-planned plot that Trump's schemers have been working on.

#4 | Posted by Augustine at 2025-02-15 11:21 PM

We are on the edge of a dictatorship.
It is quite possible that in two years there is nothing to stop Trump from becoming a Xi-style Dictator for Life; all abetted by the corrupt SCOTUS.

During that time, our allies will shun us and we will quie possible have a major financial crash. Not that Trump or First Lady Musk would care.

#5 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-02-16 07:02 PM

"We are on the edge of a dictatorship."

If you have to "ask" then you doing it wrong.

#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-02-16 07:30 PM

We are on the edge of a dictatorship.

Edge?

That was pre Election Day 2024.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-02-16 07:40 PM

We have 3 branches of government. No agency should be able to operate outside the executive and/or legislative branch. Civics101

#8 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 01:49 AM

We have 3 branches of government. No agency should be able to operate outside the executive and/or legislative branch. Civics101

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 01:49 AM | Reply

Then you wouldn't be supporting DIGE if you really and truly believed that. Which you clearly don't.

#9 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-17 01:52 AM

DOGE

#10 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-17 01:54 AM

#9. DOGE reports to the Executive.

#11 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 10:35 AM

^"ALLEGEDLY reports..." ftfy

#12 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-02-17 10:42 AM

9. DOGE reports to the Executive.

#11 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

I doubt that ..

And who does Trumpy report to?

His probation officer.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-02-17 10:58 AM

. DOGE reports to the Executive.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 10

DOGE has no constitutional authority to exist. The others do. Who am I kidding. You don't give a crap about the Constitution and the rule of law Jeff. You proven that daily here.

#14 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-17 11:32 AM

We have 3 branches of government. No agency should be able to operate outside the executive and/or legislative branch. Civics101

Civics 101. A small number of agencies have been created by Congress, legislation signed by the Executive, to operate outside the political whims of the Executive. That legislation provides a process within which Executive can operate. The Buffoon is saying, "F*k that s*t, I'll do whatever I want." So here we are with idiots defending such stupid.

Btw, this appeal is not about the merits of what the Buffoon can or can't do. It's about whether a TRO (effective for 14 days) can be stayed. Forever the answer has been no. Petulant child that he is, no for two weeks is too much for the Buffoon.

#15 | Posted by et_al at 2025-02-17 11:43 AM

" DOGE has no constitutional authority to exist"

DOGE is is the USDS renamed. It already existed.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 12:18 PM

DOGE is is the USDS renamed.

#16 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Much like MAGA is fascism re-named?

I can't help but notice that Mush is more powerful than Donald. Is that Constitutional?

Who gets that Nazi salute?

#17 | Posted by Zed at 2025-02-17 12:25 PM

#16 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Is there anyone here who thinks BELLRINGER gives a rat's ass about the Constitution?

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-02-17 12:26 PM

I give more of a rat's ass about the Constitution than you do, Zed.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 12:29 PM

Going back to Woodrow Wilson the left in this country has shown nothing but contempt for the Constitution with 1A now more hated than 2A.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 12:30 PM

DOGE has no constitutional authority to exist.

Remember when Jeff as wailing and crying over the special counsel is unconstitutional.

Doesn't say a peep about this at all.

Because he's a trumpturd.

#21 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-02-17 12:32 PM

Apples and oranges, Richard.

#22 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 12:38 PM

Is there anyone here who thinks BELLRINGER gives a rat's ass about the Constitution?

#18 | Posted by Zed at 2025-02-17 12:26 PM | Reply

He's more partisan than constitutional.

When trump violated the 2nd amendment and banned bump stocks (which was later thrown out) he didn't say a word.

#23 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-02-17 12:42 PM

I give more of a rat's ass about the Constitution than you do, Zed.

#19 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Yes, of course.

That's why you support the Dictator.

#24 | Posted by Zed at 2025-02-17 12:44 PM

Apples and oranges

#22 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Hamburger and eggs.

#25 | Posted by Zed at 2025-02-17 12:45 PM

DOGE is is the USDS renamed. It already existed.

#16 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 12:18 PM | Reply

That still doesn't give it legitimacy Dummkopf. Like I said. It has no constitutional authority to exist.

#26 | Posted by lauramohr at 2025-02-17 12:48 PM

It's a commission, Laura Mohr. Do you remember when Obama created Simpson-Bowles? Same type of thing.

#27 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-17 12:59 PM

en.m.wikipedia.org

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (often called Simpson"Bowles or Bowles"Simpson from the names of co-chairs Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles; or NCFRR) was a bipartisan Presidential Commission on deficit reduction,[1] created in 2010 by President Barack Obama to identify "policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run".[2] The 18-member Commission, consisting of 12 members of Congress and six private citizens,[3] first met on April 27, 2010.[4] A report was released on December 1,[1] recommending a combination of spending cuts (including an increase in the Social Security retirement age and cuts to military, benefit, and domestic spending) and tax increases (including restricting or eliminating certain tax credits and deductions and increasing the federal gasoline tax).[3

Jeff isn't really good at defending the indefensible is he?? Giggles

#28 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-17 01:06 PM

from Imgflip Meme Generator

#29 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-17 02:04 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Gallup: More U.S. Adults Identify as LGBTQ+ in 2024 (113 comments)

WaPo: Trump Expected to Take Control of USPS (61 comments)

Hegseth's Proposed Pentagon Cuts, Firing of Generals (38 comments)

Target Sued by Florida for Defrauding Shareholders About DEI (35 comments)

DOGE Has 'God Mode' Access to Government Data (28 comments)

Musk's Bodyguards Deputized as US Marshals (27 comments)

Economist: Musk is About to Cause a 'Deep, Deep Recession' (26 comments)

Power-to-the-States 'King' Wants to End NYC Congestion Pricing (19 comments)

Military Families Rocked By Trump's Government Cuts (18 comments)

Mississippi Judge Orders Paper to Remove Editorial (15 comments)